Data for: Bioprocess optimization of nutritional parameters for enhanced anti-leukemic L-asparaginase production from Aspergillus candidus UCCM 00117: a sequential statistical approach

This dataset describes the sequence of experiments conducted to optimize nutrients required to formulate a fermentation medium for production of a glutaminase-near-free L-asparaginase by a strain of Aspergillus candidus. It also presents data for effects of temperature, pH and metal ions on L-asparaginase activity and stability, as well as the therapeutic anti-cancer potential of the enzyme. Research hypotheses: Medium composition significantly influences L-asparaginase activity. Significant differences exist among levels of temperature, pH and metal ion effects on enzyme activity. Findings: One-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) approach was valuable to select the major variables for L-asparaginase activity. The raw data as well as the 95% confidence interval statistic of the experiments are presented as Tables DT1 to DT4 and Figs DF1 to DF4 for carbon and nitrogen sources, spore density and metal ions respectively. Plackett-Burman design (PBD) helped to identify significant predictors towards enhanced L-asparaginase activity. Table DT5 presents the 2-level factorial design matrix for the PBD screening. Table DT6 is the analysis of variance (ANOVA) for full regression model of PBD analysis. Table DT7 is the coefficient table from which significant terms were extracted to build the first-order model. The path of steepest ascent (PSA) set up experiments to move the levels of significant variables close to optimum using coefficients of significant variables from first-order model. The raw data and 95% confidence interval statistic are presented as Table DT8 and Fig DF5. Factor levels for experiment 7 which produced maximum L-asparaginase activity served as center points for response surface methodology (RSM). Table DT9 is the design matrix for central composite design (CRD) of the RSM. Tables DT10 and DT11 are the ANOVA for full quadratic models for biomass concentration (Y1) and total protein (Y2) respectively, while Table DT12 is predictor coefficient summary with p-values. The diagnostic plots to test model adequacy are presented as Figs DF6a-c (Y1), Figs DF10a-c (Y2) and Figs DF14a-c (Y3). The surface (3-D) plots of significant two-way interactions of factors are presented as Figs DF7a-i (Y1), DF11a-j (Y2) and DF15a-n for L-asparaginase activity (Y3). Individual factor and cube plots are presented as Figs DF8 and DF9 (Y1), Figs DF12 and DF13 (Y2) and Figs DF16 and DF17 (Y3). A multi-objective optimization approach with desirability function was employed for the opt