A rapid calprotectin test for the diagnosis of pleural effusion

Altres ajuts: Xunta de Galicia (CN/2014); grant of societies AEER (2015); SOGAPAR (2014); Fundación Biomédica Galicia Sur, integrated research programs of SEPAR (PII Neumología Intervencionista 2015). In previous studies, measuring the levels of calprotectin in patients with pleural effusion (PE) wa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Casado-Rey, P, Vázquez-Iglesias, L, Botana-Rial, M, Andrade-Olivié, M.A, Ferreiro-Fernández, L, José Capilla, E.S, Núñez-Ares, Ana, de Miguel, E.B, Pajares Ruiz, Virginia, Fernández-Villar, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Altres ajuts: Xunta de Galicia (CN/2014); grant of societies AEER (2015); SOGAPAR (2014); Fundación Biomédica Galicia Sur, integrated research programs of SEPAR (PII Neumología Intervencionista 2015). In previous studies, measuring the levels of calprotectin in patients with pleural effusion (PE) was an exceptionally accurate way to predict malignancy. Here, we evaluated a rapid method for the measurement of calprotectin levels as a useful parameter in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) in order to minimise invasive diagnostic tests. Calprotectin levels were measured with Quantum Blue sCAL (QBsCAL) and compared with the gold standard reference ELISA method. Calprotectin levels in patients with benign pleural effusion (BPE) were significantly higher (p < 0.0001) than for MPE patients. We measured the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) for a cut-off value of ≤ 14,150 ng/mL; the diagnostic accuracy was 64%. The odds ratio for PE calprotectin levels was 10.938 (95% CI [4.133 − 28.947]). The diagnostic performance of calprotectin concentration was better for predicting MPE compared to other individual parameters. Comparison of two assays showed a slope of 1.084, an intercept of 329.7, and a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.798. The Bland-Altman test showed a positive bias for the QBsCAL method compared to ELISA fCAL. Clinical concordance between both these methods was 88.5% with a Cohen kappa index of 0.76 (95% CI [0.68 − 0.84]). We concluded that QBsCAL is a fast, reliable, and non-invasive diagnostic tool for diagnosing MPE and represents an alternative to ELISA that could be implemented in medical emergencies.