Lessons, narratives, and research directions for a sustainable circular economy

Unidad de excelencia María de Maeztu CEX2019-000940-M The current enthusiasm for the circular economy (CE) offers a unique opportunity to advance the impact of research on sustainability transitions. Diverse interpretations of CE by scholars, however, produce partly opposing assessments of its poten...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Leipold, Sina, Petit Boix, Anna, Luo, Anran, Helander, Hanna, Simoens, Machteld, Ashton, Weslynne S, Babbitt, Callie W, Bala Gala, Alba, Bening, Catharina R, Birkved, Morten, Blomsma, Fenna, Boks, Casper, Boldrin, Alessio, Deutz, Pauline, Domenech, Teresa, Ferronato, Navarro, Gallego Schmid, Alejandro, Giurco, Damien, Hobson, Kersty, Husgafvel, Roope, Isenhour, Cynthia, Kriipsalu, Mait, Masi, Donato, Mendoza, Joan Manuel F, Milios, Leonidas, Niero, Monia, Pant, Deepak, Parajuly, Keshav, Pauliuk, Stefan, Pieroni, Marina P.P, Richter, Jessika Luth, Saidani, Michael, Smol, Marzena, Talens Peiró, Laura, van Ewijk, Stijn, Vermeulen, Walter J.V, Wiedenhofer, Dominik, Xue, Bing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Unidad de excelencia María de Maeztu CEX2019-000940-M The current enthusiasm for the circular economy (CE) offers a unique opportunity to advance the impact of research on sustainability transitions. Diverse interpretations of CE by scholars, however, produce partly opposing assessments of its potential benefits, which can hinder progress. Here, we synthesize policy-relevant lessons and research directions for a sustainable CE and identify three narratives-optimist, reformist, and skeptical-that underpin the ambiguity in CE assessments. Based on 54 key CE scholars' insights, we identify three research needs: the articulation and discussion of ontologically distinct CE narratives; bridging of technical, managerial, socio-economic, environmental, and political CE perspectives; and critical assessment of opportunities and limits of CE science-policy interactions. Our findings offer practical guidance for scholars to engage reflexively with the rapid expansion of CE knowledge, identify and pursue high-impact research directions, and communicate more effectively withpractitioners and policymakers.