Validity of the Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire in European Older Adults Using English, Spanish, German and Danish Versions
The main aim of this study was to assess the criterion validity of the Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ) to measure SB in community-dwelling older adults using thigh-measured accelerometry as the criterion method. 801 participants (75.6 ± 6.1 years old, 57.6% females) provided valid thigh-based...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The main aim of this study was to assess the criterion validity of the Sedentary Behavior
Questionnaire (SBQ) to measure SB in community-dwelling older adults using thigh-measured
accelerometry as the criterion method. 801 participants (75.6 ± 6.1 years old, 57.6% females)
provided valid thigh-based accelerometer data (activPAL/Axivity) and completed the SBQ.
Criterion validity was assessed using Spearman’s Rho coefficients. Bland–Altman plots, including
95% limits of agreement and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), were used to assess the
agreement between self-report and device-measured daily SB time. Strength of the association
was examined using multiple linear regression. There was a weak correlation (Rho = 0.25, p < .001)
between self-reported and device-based SB measures. The SBQ under-estimated daily SB time
compared to accelerometry. Our results highlighted an overall weak-to-moderate correlation
between measures, with significant differences between each country’s version. Researchers should
be cautious when using the SBQ to provide an estimation of SB time in older adults. |
---|