Lesion filling effect in regional brain volume estimations: a study in multiple sclerosis patients with low lesion load

Introduction Regional brain volume estimation in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients is prone to error due to white matter lesions being erroneously segmented as grey matter. The Lesion Segmentation Toolbox (LST) is an automatic tool that estimates a lesion mask based on 3D T2-FLAIR images and then use...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuroradiology 2016-05, Vol.58 (5), p.467-474
Hauptverfasser: Pareto, D, Sastre-Garriga, J, Aymerich, F X, Auger, C, Tintoré, M, Montalban, X, Rovira, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Regional brain volume estimation in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients is prone to error due to white matter lesions being erroneously segmented as grey matter. The Lesion Segmentation Toolbox (LST) is an automatic tool that estimates a lesion mask based on 3D T2-FLAIR images and then uses this mask to fill the structural MRI image. The goal of this study was (1) to test the LST for estimating white matter lesion volume in a cohort of MS patients using 2D T2-FLAIR images, and (2) to evaluate the performance of the optimized LST on image segmentation and the impact on the calculated grey matter fraction (GMF). Methods The study included 110 patients with a clinically isolated syndrome and 42 with a relapsing-remitting MS scanned on a 3.0-T MRI system. In a subset of consecutively selected patients, the lesion mask was semi-manually delineated over T2-FLAIR images. After establishing the optimized LST parameters, the corresponding regional fractions were calculated for the original, filled, and masked images. Results A high agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.955) was found between the (optimized) LST and the semi-manual lesion volume estimations. The GMF was significantly smaller when lesions were masked (mean difference −0.603, p  
ISSN:0028-3940
1432-1920
DOI:10.1007/s00234-016-1654-5