Lesion Segmentation in Automated 3D Breast Ultrasound: Volumetric Analysis

Mammography is the gold standard screening technique in breast cancer, but it has some limitations for women with dense breasts. In such cases, sonography is usually recommended as an additional imaging technique. A traditional sonogram produces a two-dimensional (2D) visualization of the breast and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasonic imaging 2018-03, Vol.40 (2), p.97-112
Hauptverfasser: Agarwal, Richa, Diaz, Oliver, Lladó, Xavier, Gubern-Mérida, Albert, Vilanova, Joan C., Martí, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Mammography is the gold standard screening technique in breast cancer, but it has some limitations for women with dense breasts. In such cases, sonography is usually recommended as an additional imaging technique. A traditional sonogram produces a two-dimensional (2D) visualization of the breast and is highly operator dependent. Automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) has also been proposed to produce a full 3D scan of the breast automatically with reduced operator dependency, facilitating double reading and comparison with past exams. When using ABUS, lesion segmentation and tracking changes over time are challenging tasks, as the three-dimensional (3D) nature of the images makes the analysis difficult and tedious for radiologists. The goal of this work is to develop a semi-automatic framework for breast lesion segmentation in ABUS volumes which is based on the Watershed algorithm. The effect of different de-noising methods on segmentation is studied showing a significant impact ( p < 0 . 05 ) on the performance using a dataset of 28 temporal pairs resulting in a total of 56 ABUS volumes. The volumetric analysis is also used to evaluate the performance of the developed framework. A mean Dice Similarity Coefficient of 0 . 69 ± 0 . 11 with a mean False Positive ratio 0 . 35 ± 0 . 14 has been obtained. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the segmented volumes and the corresponding ground truth volumes is r 2 = 0 . 960 ( p = 0 . 05 ). Similar analysis, performed on 28 temporal (prior and current) pairs, resulted in a good correlation coefficient r 2 = 0 . 967 ( p < 0 . 05 ) for prior and r 2 = 0 . 956 ( p < 0 . 05 ) for current cases. The developed framework showed prospects to help radiologists to perform an assessment of ABUS lesion volumes, as well as to quantify volumetric changes during lesions diagnosis and follow-up.
ISSN:0161-7346
1096-0910
1096-0910
DOI:10.1177/0161734617737733