Serum Neurofilament Light Trajectories and Their Relation to Subclinical Radiological Disease Activity in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Patients in the APLIOS Trial

Biomarker; Ofatumumab; Relapsing multiple sclerosis Biomarcador; Ofatumumab; Esclerosis múltiple recurrente Biomarcador; Ofatumumab; Esclerosi múltiple recurrent Introduction Several studies have described prognostic value of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) at the group level in relapsing mul...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Bar-Or, Amit, Montalban Gairín, Xavier, Hu, Xixi, Kropshofer, Harald, Kukkaro, Petra, Coello, Neva
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Biomarker; Ofatumumab; Relapsing multiple sclerosis Biomarcador; Ofatumumab; Esclerosis múltiple recurrente Biomarcador; Ofatumumab; Esclerosi múltiple recurrent Introduction Several studies have described prognostic value of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) at the group level in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) patients. Here, we aimed to explore the temporal association between sNfL and development of subclinical disease activity as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the group level and evaluate the potential of sNfL as a biomarker for capturing subclinical disease activity in individual RMS patients. Methods In the 12-week APLIOS study, patients (N = 284) received subcutaneous ofatumumab 20 mg. Frequent sNfL sampling (14 time points over 12 weeks) and monthly MRI scans enabled key analyses including assessment of the group-level temporal relationship of sNfL levels with on-study subclinical development of gadolinium-enhancing (Gd +)T1 lesions. Prognostic value of baseline sNfL (“high” vs. “low”) level for subsequent on-study clinical relapse or Gd + T1 activity was assessed. Individual patient-level development of on-study Gd + T1 lesions was compared across three predictors: baseline Gd + T1 lesion number, baseline sNfL (“high” vs. “low”), and time-matched sNfL. Results In patients developing Gd + T1 lesions at week 4 (absent at baseline), sNfL levels increased during the month preceding the week-4 MRI scan and then gradually decreased back to baseline. High versus low baseline sNfL conferred increased risk of subsequent on-study clinical relapse or Gd + T1 activity (HR, 2.81; p