Comparative Cardiovascular Efficacy & Safety of NSAIDs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

NSAIDs, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, are popular and efficient analgesis and frequent mainstay treatements for inflammatory disorders. However, their cardiovascular safety is questionable. The aims of the current study were: (1) to evaluate the comparative cardiovascular efficacy o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research 2024-04, Vol.36 (5), p.177-192
Hauptverfasser: Mahmood, Arhum, Chaudhry, Raheel, Moazam, Mustafa M., Zahee, Mohammed T., Ullah, Imdad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:NSAIDs, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, are popular and efficient analgesis and frequent mainstay treatements for inflammatory disorders. However, their cardiovascular safety is questionable. The aims of the current study were: (1) to evaluate the comparative cardiovascular efficacy of NSAIDs; (2) to investigate the cardiovascular safety and risks associated with NSAID use; (3) to highlight the importance of alternative therapies for patients who display contraindications to NSAID. A number of digital databases were explored to retrieve relevant studies. These consist of ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, etc. The final sample consisted of 17 primary studies.A total of 12/17 (71%) studies advocated the efficacy and safety of NSAIDs. The remaining 2/17 (11%) showed that there was no discernible difference between the NSAID and non-NSAID groups in terms of mortality, cardio-respiratory morbidity, and cardiovascular risk. A forest plot was created using data from eight distinct studies. The results for the incidence of cardiovascular events were found to be statistically significant. The heterogeneity was calculated to be Tau2= 0.15; Chi2=117.67; df=6; I2=95%. The overall effect size was found to be Z=0.08 (p
ISSN:2456-8899
2456-8899
DOI:10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i55427