Clinical accuracy of infrared temperature measurement devices: a comparison against non-invasive core-body temperature

During the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the implementation of non-contact infrared thermometry (NCIT) became an increasingly popular method of screening body temperature. However, data on the accuracy of these devices and the standardisation of their use are limited. In the current study, t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical medicine (London, England) England), 2023-03, Vol.23 (2), p.157-163
Hauptverfasser: Holder, Thomas, Hooper, Frances Sophie Woodley, Yates, David, Tse, Zion, Patil, Samadhan, Moussa, Ahmed, Batten, Lucy, Radhakrishnan, Vignesh, Allison, Mark, Hewitt, Catherine, Keding, Ada, Forshaw, Greg, Jayagopal, Vijay
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:During the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the implementation of non-contact infrared thermometry (NCIT) became an increasingly popular method of screening body temperature. However, data on the accuracy of these devices and the standardisation of their use are limited. In the current study, the body temperature of non-febrile volunteers was measured using infrared (IR) thermography, IR tympanic thermometry and IR gun thermometry at different facial feature locations and distances and compared with SpotOn core-body temperature. Poor agreement was found between all IR devices and SpotOn measurements (intra-class correlation coefficient
ISSN:1470-2118
1473-4893
DOI:10.7861/clinmed.2022-0252