A Comparison of Accuracy between IMMULITE2000® and GENEDIA® for Helicobacter pylori Infection

Background/Aims: In serological tests for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (GENEDIA®) and a solid-phase, two-step chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (IMMULITE®), which are easy to perform, inexpensive, and widely available, are commonly used. However, local vali...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research 2020-03, Vol.20 (1), p.54-62
Hauptverfasser: Lim, Seon Hee, Kim, Nayoung, Kim, Sung Eun, Baik, Gwang Ho, Lee, Ju Yup, Park, Kyung Sik, Shin, Jeong Eun, Song, Hyun Joo, Myung, Dae-Seong, Choi, Suck Chei, Kim, Hyun Jin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background/Aims: In serological tests for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (GENEDIA®) and a solid-phase, two-step chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (IMMULITE®), which are easy to perform, inexpensive, and widely available, are commonly used. However, local validation of the test performance of IMMULITE® is required. This study aimed to examine the performance of IMMULITE® in comparison with that of GENEDIA® in a Korean health checkup population.Materials and Methods: The sera of 300 subjects among those who underwent health checkup were analyzed using IMMULITE®, and results were compared with those of GENEDIA®. The two serological tests were compared for their ability to predict atrophic gastritis (AG) or intestinal metaplasia (IM) on endoscopy.Results: We found significant correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.903, P
ISSN:1738-3331
2671-826X
DOI:10.7704/kjhugr.2019.0014