'Override'-refleksiver i dansk og engelsk
‘Override’ reflexives in Danish and English Surprisingly, English allows (i) Peter’s behaviour only damages himself.(ii) Peter doesn’t realise that such behaviour only damages himself. although himself does not refer to the subject (i.e. Peter’s behaviour/such behaviour). Far from all clauses allow...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ny forskning i grammatik 2020-09 (27) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ‘Override’ reflexives in Danish and English Surprisingly, English allows
(i) Peter’s behaviour only damages himself.(ii) Peter doesn’t realise that such behaviour only damages himself.
although himself does not refer to the subject (i.e. Peter’s behaviour/such behaviour). Far from all clauses allow himself to not refer to the subject, and therefore himself in (i-ii) is often called an ‘override’ reflexive. We suggest that ‘override’ reflexives are the combination of nonreflexive him with the intensifier himself, and that this is then ‘shortened’ from him himself to himself. In Danish, the combination of the corresponding pronoun ham with the corresponding intensifier selv results in the Danish ‘override’ reflexive ham selv. This paper will show how Danish having two versions of ham selv and English two versions of himself fits into the general reflexive systems of the two languages. The analysis will be held up against data from the major corpora: KorpusDK, BNC and COCA. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1902-1291 2446-1709 |
DOI: | 10.7146/nfg.v0i27.122135 |