Benefits of the ThinPrep® Integrated Imager for cervical cytology

Objective : We compared the performance of a computerized ThinPrep® (TP) Integrated Imager (I2) with the manual reading of paired TP slides stained with an ordinary Papanicolaou stain (TPM).Study Design : The study consisted of 552 cases, and compared the results of I2-screened TP (TPI) with TPM. Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nippon Rinsho Saibo Gakkai zasshi 2019, Vol.58(5), pp.189-195
Hauptverfasser: KANEDA, Atsuyo, YASUOKA, Hironao, GUNJI, Yuriko, FUKUDA, Saori, AOKI, Hiroshi, SHIMADA, Kaori, TSUKIYAMA, Ayumi, TSUJI, Hiromi, TSUJIMOTO, Masahiko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; jpn
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective : We compared the performance of a computerized ThinPrep® (TP) Integrated Imager (I2) with the manual reading of paired TP slides stained with an ordinary Papanicolaou stain (TPM).Study Design : The study consisted of 552 cases, and compared the results of I2-screened TP (TPI) with TPM. This study also compared high risk human papillomavirus (HPV) positive rates in cases of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) diagnosed using TPI with those diagnosed using TPM.Results : Concordance in cytologic diagnoses between TPI and TPM was 88.4%. Concordance between cytologic and histologic diagnoses for TPM was 86.2%, and that for TPI was 93.1%. The detection rate of a low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion with TPM was 95.0% and that for TPI was 97.5%. The detection rate of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and high-grade disease with TPM was 60.0%, and that of TPI was 86.7%. These results suggest TPI is more accurate than TPM for diagnoses of HSIL and high-grade disease. The high-risk HPV positive rate in ASC-US cases of TPM was 58.3%, and that for TPI was 66.7%.Conclusion : The I2 is useful in cervical screening and may contribute to improved accuracy in cytologic diagnoses.
ISSN:0387-1193
1882-7233
DOI:10.5795/jjscc.58.189