Factors determining best surgical exposure and safe clip positioning in anterior communicating artery (AComA) aneurysms surgery – particular significance of AComA complex rotation in axial plane

Introduction. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether Anterior Communicating Artery (AComA) complex rotation in axial plane may influence the ease of surgical exploration in this region and safety of clip positioning when left vs right-sided approach is compared. Materials and methods. This is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Polski przeglád chirurgiczny 2019-10, Vol.91 (5), p.1-5
Hauptverfasser: Świątnicki, Wojciech, Radomiak-Załuska, Anna, Heleniak, Mariusz, Komuński, Piotr
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether Anterior Communicating Artery (AComA) complex rotation in axial plane may influence the ease of surgical exploration in this region and safety of clip positioning when left vs right-sided approach is compared. Materials and methods. This is a retrospective study based on analysis of patients operated due to AComA aneurysm, both ruptured and unruptured. AComA complex position in relation to coronal plane was evaluated using 3D-CTA VR reconstructions. Next, comparison between surgical approach from the side where A1-A2 junction (angle) was located anterior and posterior to coronal plane was performed in relation to surgical difficulties and intra- and postoperative complications. Results. Subgroup statistical analysis revealed that there is a strong and statistically significant correlation between AComA complex rotation and surgical difficulties expressed by the need of repeated temporary clip application and brain transgression. When anterior vs posterior angle side approach was compared in relation to surgical difficulties and complications, there was a statistically significant difference with strong correlation (p
ISSN:0032-373X
2299-2847
DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0013.5285