Reoperation in colorectal cancer surgery

Background Reoperations in colorectal surgery are usually a consequence of major surgical complications. Recently, the rate of reoperation has been proposed as a marker of surgical performance. Yet, the incidence of re-intervention varies significantly in literature, ranging from 5,2 % to 13 %. Ther...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Polski przeglád chirurgiczny 2019-05, Vol.91 (3), p.1-5
Hauptverfasser: Zawadzki, Marek, Krzystek-Korpacka, Małgorzata, Rząca, Marek, Czarnecki, Roman, Obuszko, Zbigniew, Sitarska, Magdalena, Witkiewicz, Wojciech
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Reoperations in colorectal surgery are usually a consequence of major surgical complications. Recently, the rate of reoperation has been proposed as a marker of surgical performance. Yet, the incidence of re-intervention varies significantly in literature, ranging from 5,2 % to 13 %. Therefore, in this study, we investigated 30-day reoperation rates and made an attempt to identify risk factors of re-intervention following colorectal resection at our institution. Methods This is a retrospective study of patients who had undergone colorectal resection at a single institution from 2013 to 2017. Univariate and multivariate analysis of predicting factors were performed. Results Out of 464 patients included 51 required reoperations (11%). The most common causes of reoperations were anastomotic leakage, postoperative bleeding, and wound dehiscence. In univariate analysis the age of the patient and location of the tumor were related to an increased rate of reoperation. In multivariate analysis patients older than 75 (OR = 2.1; 95%CI = 1.1-3.9) and tumors sited in the rectum (OR = 2.66; 95%CI = 1.4-5) were associated with an increased risk of re-intervention. Patients who required postoperative re-intervention stayed in hospital longer (14 vs. 6 days, p
ISSN:0032-373X
2299-2847
DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0013.1922