On One of Materials Concerning Tax Collect in Egypt of Early Islamic Period
Although Daniel C. Dennett, after his investigation of Aphrodito Greek Papyrus, opposed the “Tribute” thesis of Becker, the way of collecting tax organized in the middle Umayyad dynasty is found to be different from one of traditional materials which is recorded by al-Maqrizi's al-khitat. This...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan 1963/08/30, Vol.6(1), pp.85-93,127 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | jpn |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Although Daniel C. Dennett, after his investigation of Aphrodito Greek Papyrus, opposed the “Tribute” thesis of Becker, the way of collecting tax organized in the middle Umayyad dynasty is found to be different from one of traditional materials which is recorded by al-Maqrizi's al-khitat. This should be identified to be one of the Arab Conquest Age. The system of tax collect was gradually established in the age of Umayyad dynasty when the Arabic rule over Egypt was strengthened, in parallel with the centralization of Islamic Empire. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0030-5219 1884-1406 |
DOI: | 10.5356/jorient.6.85 |