RUU 355 from an Islamic Perspective: Improve Legal Safeguards in Tandem with Higher Punishments

Muslims generally favour upholding the Shari’ah, especially at the highest levels of government. Any implementation of this aspiration, however, must follow the necessary guidelines. It should not take place at the expense of the principles and values of the Shari’ah itself. This article takes a loo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Islam and civilisational renewal 2017-10, Vol.8 (4), p.543-546
1. Verfasser: Wan Mansor, Wan Naim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 546
container_issue 4
container_start_page 543
container_title Islam and civilisational renewal
container_volume 8
creator Wan Mansor, Wan Naim
description Muslims generally favour upholding the Shari’ah, especially at the highest levels of government. Any implementation of this aspiration, however, must follow the necessary guidelines. It should not take place at the expense of the principles and values of the Shari’ah itself. This article takes a look at RUU 355 and some concerns arising from it. On 26 May 2016, Abdul Hadi Awang, an opposition leader in Malaysia’s Parliament and President of the Islamic Party of Malaysia (PAS), introduced a Private Members Bill, known as RUU 355 (Bill, Malay: Rang Undang-Undang) to amend the Syariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 1965. The Bill seeks to raise the upper boundaries of Syariah courts sentencing limits while retaining the offences under the jurisdiction of Syariah courts, as specified in List II of the State List of the Ninth Schedule to the Federal Constitution.
doi_str_mv 10.52282/icr.v8i4.165
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_52282_icr_v8i4_165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_52282_icr_v8i4_165</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_52282_icr_v8i4_1653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVzzFPwzAQBWCrohIVdGS_P5AQOzV1WRGolTpU0ErdLCu9JEaxE92lQfx7QoW685b3hrd8QjzILNVKGfXoC0oH4xepfNITMVPZQiZmqczNdcvjrZgzf2ZjtF6aVT4T9v1wgFxrKKkN4CJsuHHBF7BD4g6L3g_4DJvQUTsgbLFyDXy4EquzoxODj7B38YQBvnxfw9pXNRLsztFzHTD2fC-mpWsY5399J5K31_3LOimoZSYsbUc-OPq2MrMXiB0h9hdiR0j-3_8PoP1Rgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>RUU 355 from an Islamic Perspective: Improve Legal Safeguards in Tandem with Higher Punishments</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Wan Mansor, Wan Naim</creator><creatorcontrib>Wan Mansor, Wan Naim</creatorcontrib><description>Muslims generally favour upholding the Shari’ah, especially at the highest levels of government. Any implementation of this aspiration, however, must follow the necessary guidelines. It should not take place at the expense of the principles and values of the Shari’ah itself. This article takes a look at RUU 355 and some concerns arising from it. On 26 May 2016, Abdul Hadi Awang, an opposition leader in Malaysia’s Parliament and President of the Islamic Party of Malaysia (PAS), introduced a Private Members Bill, known as RUU 355 (Bill, Malay: Rang Undang-Undang) to amend the Syariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 1965. The Bill seeks to raise the upper boundaries of Syariah courts sentencing limits while retaining the offences under the jurisdiction of Syariah courts, as specified in List II of the State List of the Ninth Schedule to the Federal Constitution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2041-871X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-8728</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.52282/icr.v8i4.165</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Islam and civilisational renewal, 2017-10, Vol.8 (4), p.543-546</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wan Mansor, Wan Naim</creatorcontrib><title>RUU 355 from an Islamic Perspective: Improve Legal Safeguards in Tandem with Higher Punishments</title><title>Islam and civilisational renewal</title><description>Muslims generally favour upholding the Shari’ah, especially at the highest levels of government. Any implementation of this aspiration, however, must follow the necessary guidelines. It should not take place at the expense of the principles and values of the Shari’ah itself. This article takes a look at RUU 355 and some concerns arising from it. On 26 May 2016, Abdul Hadi Awang, an opposition leader in Malaysia’s Parliament and President of the Islamic Party of Malaysia (PAS), introduced a Private Members Bill, known as RUU 355 (Bill, Malay: Rang Undang-Undang) to amend the Syariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 1965. The Bill seeks to raise the upper boundaries of Syariah courts sentencing limits while retaining the offences under the jurisdiction of Syariah courts, as specified in List II of the State List of the Ninth Schedule to the Federal Constitution.</description><issn>2041-871X</issn><issn>2041-8728</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVzzFPwzAQBWCrohIVdGS_P5AQOzV1WRGolTpU0ErdLCu9JEaxE92lQfx7QoW685b3hrd8QjzILNVKGfXoC0oH4xepfNITMVPZQiZmqczNdcvjrZgzf2ZjtF6aVT4T9v1wgFxrKKkN4CJsuHHBF7BD4g6L3g_4DJvQUTsgbLFyDXy4EquzoxODj7B38YQBvnxfw9pXNRLsztFzHTD2fC-mpWsY5399J5K31_3LOimoZSYsbUc-OPq2MrMXiB0h9hdiR0j-3_8PoP1Rgw</recordid><startdate>20171015</startdate><enddate>20171015</enddate><creator>Wan Mansor, Wan Naim</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171015</creationdate><title>RUU 355 from an Islamic Perspective: Improve Legal Safeguards in Tandem with Higher Punishments</title><author>Wan Mansor, Wan Naim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_52282_icr_v8i4_1653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wan Mansor, Wan Naim</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Islam and civilisational renewal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wan Mansor, Wan Naim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RUU 355 from an Islamic Perspective: Improve Legal Safeguards in Tandem with Higher Punishments</atitle><jtitle>Islam and civilisational renewal</jtitle><date>2017-10-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>546</epage><pages>543-546</pages><issn>2041-871X</issn><eissn>2041-8728</eissn><abstract>Muslims generally favour upholding the Shari’ah, especially at the highest levels of government. Any implementation of this aspiration, however, must follow the necessary guidelines. It should not take place at the expense of the principles and values of the Shari’ah itself. This article takes a look at RUU 355 and some concerns arising from it. On 26 May 2016, Abdul Hadi Awang, an opposition leader in Malaysia’s Parliament and President of the Islamic Party of Malaysia (PAS), introduced a Private Members Bill, known as RUU 355 (Bill, Malay: Rang Undang-Undang) to amend the Syariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 1965. The Bill seeks to raise the upper boundaries of Syariah courts sentencing limits while retaining the offences under the jurisdiction of Syariah courts, as specified in List II of the State List of the Ninth Schedule to the Federal Constitution.</abstract><doi>10.52282/icr.v8i4.165</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2041-871X
ispartof Islam and civilisational renewal, 2017-10, Vol.8 (4), p.543-546
issn 2041-871X
2041-8728
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_52282_icr_v8i4_165
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title RUU 355 from an Islamic Perspective: Improve Legal Safeguards in Tandem with Higher Punishments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T13%3A30%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RUU%20355%20from%20an%20Islamic%20Perspective:%20Improve%20Legal%20Safeguards%20in%20Tandem%20with%20Higher%20Punishments&rft.jtitle=Islam%20and%20civilisational%20renewal&rft.au=Wan%20Mansor,%20Wan%20Naim&rft.date=2017-10-15&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=546&rft.pages=543-546&rft.issn=2041-871X&rft.eissn=2041-8728&rft_id=info:doi/10.52282/icr.v8i4.165&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_52282_icr_v8i4_165%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true