RUU 355 from an Islamic Perspective: Improve Legal Safeguards in Tandem with Higher Punishments
Muslims generally favour upholding the Shari’ah, especially at the highest levels of government. Any implementation of this aspiration, however, must follow the necessary guidelines. It should not take place at the expense of the principles and values of the Shari’ah itself. This article takes a loo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Islam and civilisational renewal 2017-10, Vol.8 (4), p.543-546 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Muslims generally favour upholding the Shari’ah, especially at the highest levels of government. Any implementation of this aspiration, however, must follow the necessary guidelines. It should not take place at the expense of the principles and values of the Shari’ah itself. This article takes a look at RUU 355 and some concerns arising from it. On 26 May 2016, Abdul Hadi Awang, an opposition leader in Malaysia’s Parliament and President of the Islamic Party of Malaysia (PAS), introduced a Private Members Bill, known as RUU 355 (Bill, Malay: Rang Undang-Undang) to amend the Syariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 1965. The Bill seeks to raise the upper boundaries of Syariah courts sentencing limits while retaining the offences under the jurisdiction of Syariah courts, as specified in List II of the State List of the Ninth Schedule to the Federal Constitution. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2041-871X 2041-8728 |
DOI: | 10.52282/icr.v8i4.165 |