Patient preferences for advanced therapies in ulcerative colitis using conjoint analysis

Selecting an optimal advanced therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC) is difficult because of the increasing number of available therapies. This study assessed UC patients' preferences for drug profiles in decision-making regarding advanced therapies using conjoint analysis. A web-based survey was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Intestinal research 2024-10
Hauptverfasser: Kobayashi, Taku, Mizuno, Naomi, Sato, Noriko, Kawaguchi, Yutaka, Ikawa, Yoshiko, Komorita, Naruyasu, Ishikawa, Hirono
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Selecting an optimal advanced therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC) is difficult because of the increasing number of available therapies. This study assessed UC patients' preferences for drug profiles in decision-making regarding advanced therapies using conjoint analysis. A web-based survey was conducted from October to November 2023 in patients with UC aged ≥ 18 years with prior oral 5-aminosalicylic acid treatment (UMIN000052327). We quantified the importance of drug attributes (location of administration, route/frequency of administration, speed of onset-of-action, maintenancesustainability, risk of serious adverse events within 1 year, and novelty of the drug) and the part-worth utility of attribute levels in mild and severe symptom scenarios, including among employed versus unemployed patients. Of 372 patients who completed the survey, 365 were evaluated. Patient preferences were generally highly individualized. The route/frequency of administration was the most important attribute in both the mild and severe symptom scenarios. Oral administration was preferred in the mild symptom scenario, whereas no specific preference was observed in the severe symptom scenario. The route/ frequency of administration was more valued in the mild symptom scenario than in the severe one, whereas speed of onset of action was more valued in the severe symptom scenario. No significant difference was found in the preference for drug profiles between employed and unemployed patients. Patient preferences for the route/frequency of administration, as well as other drug profiles, change with disease severity but demonstrate substantial interindividual variability. Therefore, shared decision-making is important to incorporate patients' perspectives into the selection of advanced therapies.
ISSN:1598-9100
2288-1956
DOI:10.5217/ir.2024.00101