Bioequivalence evaluation of new microparticulate capsule and marketed tablet dosage forms of lornoxicam in healthy volunteers
Purpose: To compare oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetic parameters of different lornoxicam formulations and to assess similarity in plasma level profiles by statistical techniques. Methods: An open-label, two-period crossover trial was followed in 24 healthy Pakistani volunteers (22 males, 2 fe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tropical journal of pharmaceutical research 2016-04, Vol.15 (4), p.877 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose: To compare oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetic
parameters of different lornoxicam formulations and to assess
similarity in plasma level profiles by statistical techniques.
Methods: An open-label, two-period crossover trial was followed in 24
healthy Pakistani volunteers (22 males, 2 females). Each participant
received a single dose of lornoxicam controlled release (CR)
microparticles and two doses (morning and evening) of conventional
lornoxicam immediate release (IR) tablet formulation. The
microparticles were prepared by spray drying method. The formulations
were administered again in an alternate manner after a washout period
of one week. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by Kinetica 4.0
software using plasma concentration-time data. Moreover, data were
statistically analyzed at 90 % confidence interval (CI) and
Schuirmann's two one-sided t-test procedure. Results: Peak
plasma concentration (Cmax) was 20.2 % lower for CR formulation
compared to IR formulation (270.90 ng/ml vs 339.44 ng/ml, respectively)
while time taken to attain Cmax (tmax) was 5.25 and 2.08 h,
respectively. Area under the plasma drug level versus time (AUC) curve
was comparable for both CR and IR formulations. The 90 % confidence
interval (CI) values computed for Cmax, AUC0-24, and AUC0-∞ ,
after log transformation, were 87.21, 108.51 and 102.74 %,
respectively, and were within predefined bioequivalence range (80 - 125
%). Conclusion: The findings suggest that CR formulation of
lornoxicam did not change the overall pharmacokinetic properties of
lornoxicam in terms of extent and rate of lornoxicam absorption. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1596-5996 1596-9827 |
DOI: | 10.4314/tjpr.v15i4.30 |