Comparison of Sterile and Clean Dressing Techniques in Post-operative Surgical Wound Infection in a Chinese Healthcare Facility
Purpose: To investigate the effect of sterile and clean dressing techniques on wound management in a Chinese hospital, and to compare their impact on wound healing and the cost of the dressing materials with respect to postoperative surgical wounds. Methods: A total of 130 patients, comprising 70 (5...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tropical journal of pharmaceutical research 2016-02, Vol.15 (2), p.415 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose: To investigate the effect of sterile and clean dressing
techniques on wound management in a Chinese hospital, and to compare
their impact on wound healing and the cost of the dressing materials
with respect to postoperative surgical wounds. Methods: A total of 130
patients, comprising 70 (53.8 %) males and 60 (46.2 %) females, who had
undergone surgery in The Affiliated Hospital of Changchun Traditional
Chinese Medicine University, Changchun, China in 2012 - 2014 were
enrolled in the study. Of these, 65 (50 %) received sterile dressings
and 65 (50 %) clean dressings. A control group comprising 25 patients,
15 (60 %) males and 10 (40 %) females, who attended the clinic for
change dressings only, was also included. The patients' dressings
were changed four times daily with 2x sterile and 2x clean dressings.
Details of all the changes, including the nutritional status of the
patients, were recorded. The patients were followed-up up to the time
of their discharge. Results: Twelve (18.5 %) patients out of those who
received sterile or clean dressings were found to have acquired an
infection. The size of the wounds was approximately 1.8 to 32.4 cm3
(mean: 5.2 ± 6.4 cm3) in size at the start of the study and 0.6 to
4.2 cm3 at the end of the study. A significant difference was
identified between the sterile and clean dressing groups at the
beginning of the study (U = 72.5; p < 0.12). A decrease in wound
size was observed in both of these groups but was not statistically
significant, while the change in wound volume, was significantly
different (U = 84.5; p < 0.25). When the cost of the two dressing
types was compared, the sterile items were more expensive than that of
the clean items; thus, sterile dressing procedure was significantly
more costly than clean dressing procedure (p < 0.01). Conclusion:
With mounting concern regarding antimicrobial resistance and
hospital-acquired infections, suitable wound dressing techniques are
required to prevent infection and reduce the duration of wound healing
after surgery without compromising patient safety. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1596-5996 1596-9827 |
DOI: | 10.4314/tjpr.v15i2.27 |