Stacks of group representations
We start with a small paradigm shift about group representations, namely the observation that restriction to a subgroup can be understood as an extension-of-scalars. We deduce that, given a group $G$, the derived and the stable categories of representations of a subgroup $H$ can be constructed out o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the European Mathematical Society : JEMS 2015-01, Vol.17 (1), p.189-228 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We start with a small paradigm shift about group representations, namely the observation that restriction to a subgroup can be understood as an extension-of-scalars. We deduce that, given a group $G$, the derived and the stable categories of representations of a subgroup $H$ can be constructed out of the corresponding category for $G$ by a purely triangulated-categorical construction, analogous to étale extension in algebraic geometry. In the case of finite groups, we then use descent methods to investigate when modular representations of the subgroup $H$ can be extended to $G$. We show that the presheaves of plain, derived and stable representations all form stacks on the category of finite $G$-sets (or the orbit category of $G$), with respect to a suitable Grothendieck topology that we call the sipp topology. When $H$ contains a Sylow subgroup of~$G$, we use sipp Čech cohomology to describe the kernel and the image of the homomorphism $T(G)\to T(H)$, where $T(-)$ denotes the group of endotrivial representations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1435-9855 1435-9863 |
DOI: | 10.4171/JEMS/501 |