A prospective comparision of sequential chemoradiation vs concurrent chemoradiation in locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinomas

Purpose: Induction chemotherapy has shown to provide consistent benefit for local control in primary treatment of advanced oropharyngeal cancer. The beneficial role of chemoradiation following induction chemotherapy over concurrent chemoradiation has not been evaluated. Present study evaluates the s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer biology & therapy 2009-02, Vol.8 (3), p.213-217
Hauptverfasser: Gupta, Deepak, Shukla, Pragya, Bisht, Shyam Singh, Pant, Mohan Chand, Bhatt, Madan Lal, Gupta, Seema, Negi, M.P.S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: Induction chemotherapy has shown to provide consistent benefit for local control in primary treatment of advanced oropharyngeal cancer. The beneficial role of chemoradiation following induction chemotherapy over concurrent chemoradiation has not been evaluated. Present study evaluates the same prospectively. Method: Out of 135 patients of locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma, 105 patients were found eligible and randomized to treat either with induction chemotherapy consisting of 2-3 cycles of cisplatin and 5- Florouracil followed by low dose weekly cisplatin based chemoradiotherapy (treatment arm: n=48) or chemoradiotherapy only (control arm: n=57). The primary tumor and regional lymph drainage areas received 66-70 Gy in 6.5 to 7 weeks by fractionated dose schedule. Results: The response rate and acute toxicity (primary end points) in both the arms were found to be similar (P>0.05) The points disease free survival and overall survival (secondary end points) were significantly (P
ISSN:1538-4047
1555-8576
DOI:10.4161/cbt.8.3.7484