Representations with Weighted Frames and Framed Parabolic Bundles
There is a well-known correspondence (due to Mehta and Seshadri in the unitary case, and extended by Bhosle and Ramanathan to other groups), between the symplectic variety ${{M}_{h}}$ of representations of the fundamental group of a punctured Riemann surface into a compact connected Lie group $G$ ,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of mathematics 2000-12, Vol.52 (6), p.1235-1268 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | There is a well-known correspondence (due to Mehta and Seshadri in the unitary case, and extended by Bhosle and Ramanathan to other groups), between the symplectic variety
${{M}_{h}}$
of representations of the fundamental group of a punctured Riemann surface into a compact connected Lie group
$G$
, with fixed conjugacy classes
$h$
at the punctures, and a complex variety
${{\mathcal{M}}_{h}}$
of holomorphic bundles on the unpunctured surface with a parabolic structure at the puncture points. For
$G\,=\,\text{SU}\left( 2 \right)$
, we build a symplectic variety
$P$
of pairs (representations of the fundamental group into
$G$
, “weighted frame” at the puncture points), and a corresponding complex variety
$\mathcal{P}$
of moduli of “framed parabolic bundles”, which encompass respectively all of the spaces
${{M}_{h}}$
,
${{\mathcal{M}}_{h}}$
, in the sense that one can obtain
${{M}_{h}}$
from
$P$
by symplectic reduction, and
${{\mathcal{M}}_{h}}$
from
$\mathcal{P}$
by a complex quotient. This allows us to explain certain features of the toric geometry of the
$\text{SU(2)}$
moduli spaces discussed by Jeffrey and Weitsman, by giving the actual toric variety associated with their integrable system. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0008-414X 1496-4279 |
DOI: | 10.4153/CJM-2000-052-4 |