Clinical Outcome of Dinoprostone Vaginal Pessary and Dinoprostone Intracervical Gel on Induction of Labor: An Observational Study
Background: Labor induction is a common and essential procedure in obstetrics. Various new formulations of prostaglandins are currently being used for labor induction. Trials are being conducted regularly using new formulations to see the efficacy and outcome of labor induction. Materials and Method...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Marine Medical Society 2024-01, Vol.26 (1), p.25-29 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Labor induction is a common and essential procedure in obstetrics. Various new formulations of prostaglandins are currently being used for labor induction. Trials are being conducted regularly using new formulations to see the efficacy and outcome of labor induction. Materials and Methods: Prospective observational study was conducted to compare the clinical outcome of dinoprostone pessary (DP) and intracervical dinoprostone gel (DG) on induction of labor. The objectives were to study the efficacy on induction-to-delivery duration, to compare the time taken from application to initiation of labor, and the number of applications required. The study also compared the need for oxytocin augmentation, cesarean rate, and neonatal outcomes after delivery. Results: In the DP group, 86.7% of patients required single application and 68.4% of patients in the DG group required double application. In 91.6% of patients in the DG group and 68.3% of patients in the DP group labor were initiated in |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0975-3605 2589-1235 |
DOI: | 10.4103/jmms.jmms_160_22 |