Structural Insights into the Preferential Binding of PGRP-SAs from Bumblebees and Honeybees to Dap-Type Peptidoglycans Rather than Lys-Type Peptidoglycans

The peptidoglycan recognition protein SAs (PGRP-SAs) from (Bi-PGRP-SA), (Am-PGRP-SA), and PGRP-SA (Mr-PGRP-SA) exhibit an intrinsic ability to preferentially bind to Dap-type peptidoglycan (PGN) from rather than Lys-type PGN from This ability is more analogous to the binding exhibited by PGRP-LCx an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of immunology (1950) 2019-01, Vol.202 (1), p.249-259
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Yanjie, Zhao, Xiaomeng, Huang, Jiaxing, Chen, Minming, An, Jiandong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The peptidoglycan recognition protein SAs (PGRP-SAs) from (Bi-PGRP-SA), (Am-PGRP-SA), and PGRP-SA (Mr-PGRP-SA) exhibit an intrinsic ability to preferentially bind to Dap-type peptidoglycan (PGN) from rather than Lys-type PGN from This ability is more analogous to the binding exhibited by PGRP-LCx and PGRP-SD than to that exhibited by PGRP-SA in Moreover, Bi-PGRP-SA and Am-PGRP-SA share greater sequence identity with PGRP-LCx than with PGRP-SD and retain several conserved contact residues, including His /His , His /His , Trp /Trp , Ala /Ala , and Thr /Thr However, the corresponding contact residue Arg is not a major anchor residue in bees (e.g., bumblebees, honeybees, and leaf-cutting bees), and an in silico analysis indicated that the residues Thr /Thr and Ser /Ser of Bi-PGRP-SA and Am-PGRP-SA are deduced to be anchor residues. In addition, the nonconserved residues Asp in Bi-PGRP-SA and Mr-PGRP-SA and His in Am-PGRP-SA are deduced to be involved in the binding to Dap-type PGNs in bumblebees, honeybees, and leaf-cutting bees. We conclude that the structures and specificities of PGRP-SAs in bees are more analogous to those of PGRP-LCx than to those of PGRP-SA. This phenomenon might be explained by the fact that the evolutionary clade of Hymenoptera is more ancient than that of Diptera.
ISSN:0022-1767
1550-6606
DOI:10.4049/jimmunol.1800439