The biomechanical assessment of fixation methods in periprosthetic femur fractures
The aim of our study was to compare the biomechanical properties of different fixation methods used in periprosthetic femur fractures. We created sawbone models with Mallory Type 2 periprosthetic femur fractures. The periprosthetic fractures were fixed with cables, cables and strut graft, or cables...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica 2011, Vol.45 (4), p.266-269 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The aim of our study was to compare the biomechanical properties of different fixation methods used in periprosthetic femur fractures.
We created sawbone models with Mallory Type 2 periprosthetic femur fractures. The periprosthetic fractures were fixed with cables, cables and strut graft, or cables and plates. The biomechanical properties of these three different fixation methods were compared with the intact femur, the intact femur with prosthesis and the femur with periprosthetic fracture without fixation.
The periprosthetic fracture without fixation had a significantly lower yield point value than the periprosthetic fractures with fixation (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1017-995X |
DOI: | 10.3944/AOTT.2011.2338 |