Short-term Outcomes of Robot-assisted and Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Rectal Resection
Background: Few studies have compared the outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric rectal resection (Ro-ISR) and laparoscopic ISR (Lap-ISR) for the management of lower rectal cancer. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of Ro-ISR and Lap-ISR. We conducted a retrospective analysis o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi 2024, Vol.77(2), pp.70-76 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng ; jpn |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Few studies have compared the outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric rectal resection (Ro-ISR) and laparoscopic ISR (Lap-ISR) for the management of lower rectal cancer. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of Ro-ISR and Lap-ISR. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the short-term outcomes of 101 patients who underwent ISR as the primary treatment for rectal cancer between 2005 and 2020.Results: The Ro-ISR group comprised 55 patients, while the Lap-ISR group consisted of 46 patients. The distance from the anal verge to the lower margin of the tumor was 3.0 cm in the Ro-ISR group and 4.0 cm in the Lap-ISR group (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0047-1801 1882-9619 |
DOI: | 10.3862/jcoloproctology.77.70 |