The Size–Mass Relation at Rest-frame 1.5 μm from JWST/NIRCam in the COSMOS-WEB and PRIMER-COSMOS Fields

We present the galaxy stellar mass–size relation in the rest-frame near-IR (1.5 μ m) and its evolution with redshift up to z = 2.5. Sérsic profiles are measured for ∼26,000 galaxies with stellar masses M ⋆ > 10 9 M ⊙ from JWST/NIRCam F277W and F444W imaging provided by the COSMOS-WEB and PRIMER s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Astrophysical journal 2024-09, Vol.972 (2), p.134
Hauptverfasser: Martorano, Marco, van der Wel, Arjen, Baes, Maarten, Bell, Eric F., Brammer, Gabriel, Franx, Marijn, Nersesian, Angelos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We present the galaxy stellar mass–size relation in the rest-frame near-IR (1.5 μ m) and its evolution with redshift up to z = 2.5. Sérsic profiles are measured for ∼26,000 galaxies with stellar masses M ⋆ > 10 9 M ⊙ from JWST/NIRCam F277W and F444W imaging provided by the COSMOS-WEB and PRIMER surveys using coordinates, redshifts, colors, and stellar mass estimates from the COSMOS2020 catalog. The new rest-frame near-IR effective radii are generally smaller than previously measured rest-frame optical sizes, on average by 0.14 dex, with no significant dependence on redshift. For quiescent galaxies, this size offset does not depend on stellar mass, but for star-forming galaxies, the offset increases from −0.1 dex at M ⋆ = 10 9.5 M ⊙ to −0.25 dex at M ⋆ > 10 11 M ⊙ . That is, we find that the near-IR stellar mass–size relation for star-forming galaxies is flatter in the rest-frame near-IR than in the rest-frame optical at all redshifts 0.5 < z < 2.5. The general pace of size evolution is the same in the near-IR as previously demonstrated in the optical, with slower evolution ( R e ∝ (1 + z ) −0.7 ) for L * star-forming galaxies and faster evolution ( R e ∝ (1 + z ) −1.3 ) for L * quiescent galaxies. Massive ( M ⋆ > 10 11 M ⊙ ) star-forming galaxies evolve in size almost as fast as quiescent galaxies. Low-mass ( M ⋆ < 10 10 M ⊙ ) quiescent galaxies evolve as slow as star-forming galaxies. Our main conclusion is that the size evolution narrative as it has emerged over the past two decades does not radically change when accessing the rest-frame near-IR with JWST, a better proxy of the underlying stellar mass distribution.
ISSN:0004-637X
1538-4357
DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5c6a