A Multiwavelength Classification and Study of Red Supergiant Candidates in NGC 6946

We have combined resolved stellar photometry from Hubble Space Telescope (HST), Spitzer, and Gaia to identify red supergiant (RSG) candidates in NGC 6946, based on their colors, proper motions, visual morphologies, and spectral energy distributions. We start with a large sample of 17,865 RSG candida...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Astrophysical journal 2023-03, Vol.945 (2), p.108
Hauptverfasser: Johnson, Jared R., Koplitz, Brad, Williams, Benjamin F., Dalcanton, Julianne J., Dolphin, Andrew, Girardi, Léo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We have combined resolved stellar photometry from Hubble Space Telescope (HST), Spitzer, and Gaia to identify red supergiant (RSG) candidates in NGC 6946, based on their colors, proper motions, visual morphologies, and spectral energy distributions. We start with a large sample of 17,865 RSG candidates based solely on HST near-infrared photometry. We then chose a small sample of 385 of these candidates with Spitzer matches for a more detailed study. Using evolutionary models and isochrones, we isolate a space where RSGs would be found in our photometry catalogs. We then visually inspect each candidate and compare them to Gaia catalogs to identify and remove foreground stars. As a result, we classify 95 potential RSGs, with 40 of these being in our highest-quality sample. We fit the photometry of the populations of stars in the regions surrounding the RSGs to infer their ages. Placing our best candidate RSG stars into three age bins between 1 and 30 Myr, we find 27.5% of the candidates falling between 1–10 Myr, 37.5% between 10–20 Myr, and 35% between 20–30 Myr. A comparison of our results to the models of massive star evolution shows some agreement between model luminosities and the luminosities of our candidates for each age. Three of our candidates appear significantly more consistent with binary models than single-star evolution models.
ISSN:0004-637X
1538-4357
DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/acb775