The major clades of Loasaceae: phylogenetic analysis using the plastid mat K and trn L‐trn F regions

Phylogenetic analyses of Loasaceae that apply DNA sequence data from the plastid trnL‐trnF region and matK gene in both maximum‐parsimony and maximum‐likelihood searches are presented. The results place subfamily Loasoideae as the sister of a subfamily Gronovioideae‐ Mentzelia clade. Schismocarpus i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of botany 2003-08, Vol.90 (8), p.1215-1228
Hauptverfasser: Hufford, Larry, McMahon, Michelle M., Sherwood, Anna M., Reeves, Gail, Chase, Mark W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Phylogenetic analyses of Loasaceae that apply DNA sequence data from the plastid trnL‐trnF region and matK gene in both maximum‐parsimony and maximum‐likelihood searches are presented. The results place subfamily Loasoideae as the sister of a subfamily Gronovioideae‐ Mentzelia clade. Schismocarpus is the sister of the Loasoideae‐Gronovioideae‐ Mentzelia clade. The Schismocarpus ‐Loasoideae‐Gronovioideae‐ Mentzelia clade is the sister of Eucnide . Several clades in Loasoideae receive strong support, providing insights on generic circumscription problems. Within Mentzelia , several major clades receive strong support, which clarifies relationships among previously circumscribed sections. Prior taxonomic and phylogenetic hypotheses are modeled using topology constraints in parsimony and likelihood analyses; tree lengths and likelihoods, respectively, are compared from constrained and unconstrained analyses to evaluate the relative support for various hypotheses. We use the Shimodaira‐Hasegawa (SH) test to establish the significance of the differences between constrained and unconstrained topologies. The SH test rejects topologies based on hypotheses for (1) the placement of gronovioids as the sister of the rest of Loasaceae, (2) the monophyly of subfamily Mentzelioideae as well as Gronovioideae and Loasoideae, (3) the monophyly of Loasa sensu lato as circumscribed by Urban and Gilg, and (4) the monophyly of Mentzelia torreyi and Mentzelia sect. Bartonia .
ISSN:0002-9122
1537-2197
DOI:10.3732/ajb.90.8.1215