Resistance to what? Urban contention in authoritarian Russia: Commentary on Daniela Zupan, Matthias Naumann, Gala Nettelbladt and Kristine Beurskens „Was heißt hier Widerstand? Widerständige Praktiken im Kontext von autoritärem Urbanismus

The unfolding debate on authoritarian urbanism and resistance to it largely avoided the conceptual clarification of what exactly this phenomenon is about. In this comment, I argue that authoritarian urbanism should be conceptualised as practices and tools for governing the urban space that help to maintain the autocratic order. I draw on the evidence from Russia to check if urban contention there fits into the category of „resistance to authoritarian urbanism“ and posit that it occupies the middle-ground between an open call for fundamental change in urban governance and infrapolitics.