What are Future Pain Physicians Learning? A Survey of Opioid Prescribing Practices Among US Pain Fellowship Programs
Background: Pain physicians have long been seen as subspecialists that commonly prescribe opioid medications, but the reality exists that primary care, oncologists, and surgical subspecialists find themselves embroiled in these clinical decisions just as frequently. It is a reasonable hope that pain...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pain physician 2019-11, Vol.6 (22;6), p.549-554 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Pain physicians have long been seen as subspecialists that commonly prescribe
opioid medications, but the reality exists that primary care, oncologists, and surgical subspecialists
find themselves embroiled in these clinical decisions just as frequently. It is a reasonable hope that
pain physicians emerge as leaders in navigating these muddy waters, and the most important time
to engrave practice standards is during clinical training.
Objectives: It was our hope to survey Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education
(ACGME) pain fellowship programs throughout the United States in regard to practice behaviors
for opioid prescribing in chronic noncancer pain (CNCP), and to assess what future pain physicians
are learning during their training.
Study Design: We developed a succinct, 8-question survey that attempted to gauge several
aspects of opioid prescribing practices for CNCP. A survey was prepared in electronic format and
e-mailed to each program director or chair of every ACGME accredited pain program in the United
States.
Methods: Our results were anonymously collected and percentage of response to each question
was presented in bar graph format. The survey was prepared and initially sent out in November
2017 and intermittently redistributed through April 2018.
Results: Of the 117 surveys sent through Survey Monkey, 42 responses were returned and
collected, 39 fully completed surveys, and 3 partial completions, an estimate of roughly one-third
of US ACGME pain fellowship programs.
Limitations: Completion of our survey was voluntary, roughly 35% of ACGME programs
submitted a response.
Conclusions: Data displayed in collected responses illustrate that although there is variance in
opioid prescribing practices for CNCP, many programs are limiting what they use opioids for and
have substantial nonopioid pharmacologic and or interventional aspects to their practice. Future
pain physicians throughout the country are learning diverse methods of pain management, with
opioids being only a part of their toolbox.
Key words: Opioids, ACGME, pain management fellowship, guidelines, teaching |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1533-3159 2150-1149 |
DOI: | 10.36076/ppj./2019.22.549 |