Comparison of ultrasound and electrical neurostimulation guidance in axillary brachial plexus block

Objectives: To compare ultrasound guidance (USG) and electrical neurostimulation guidance (ENSG) in axillary brachial plexus block in terms of block performing time, sensory and motor block quality, and patient satisfaction. Methodology: 200 patients undergoing elective carpal tunnel syndrome surger...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anaesthesia, pain & intensive care pain & intensive care, 2020-04, p.50-53
Hauptverfasser: Ozturk, Omur, Bilge, Ali, Tezcan, Aysu Hayriye, Yagmurdur, Hatice, Ulusoy, Gokhan Ragıp, Gezgin, Inan, Dost, Burhan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives: To compare ultrasound guidance (USG) and electrical neurostimulation guidance (ENSG) in axillary brachial plexus block in terms of block performing time, sensory and motor block quality, and patient satisfaction. Methodology: 200 patients undergoing elective carpal tunnel syndrome surgery were randomly assigned to one of two groups; the USG group or the ENSG group. Axillary blocks were performed with a mixture of 15 ml of lidocaine 2% and 15 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% (a total of 30 ml solution). Sensory block was evaluated with a pinprick test and motor block was evaluated via the Bromage scale by a blinded observer. Results: Block performing time was significantly shorter in the USG group than in the ENSG group (P
ISSN:1607-8322
2220-5799
DOI:10.35975/apic.v0i0.1243