Comparison of ultrasound and electrical neurostimulation guidance in axillary brachial plexus block
Objectives: To compare ultrasound guidance (USG) and electrical neurostimulation guidance (ENSG) in axillary brachial plexus block in terms of block performing time, sensory and motor block quality, and patient satisfaction. Methodology: 200 patients undergoing elective carpal tunnel syndrome surger...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anaesthesia, pain & intensive care pain & intensive care, 2020-04, p.50-53 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives: To compare ultrasound guidance (USG) and electrical neurostimulation guidance (ENSG) in axillary brachial plexus block in terms of block performing time, sensory and motor block quality, and patient satisfaction.
Methodology: 200 patients undergoing elective carpal tunnel syndrome surgery were randomly assigned to one of two groups; the USG group or the ENSG group. Axillary blocks were performed with a mixture of 15 ml of lidocaine 2% and 15 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% (a total of 30 ml solution). Sensory block was evaluated with a pinprick test and motor block was evaluated via the Bromage scale by a blinded observer.
Results: Block performing time was significantly shorter in the USG group than in the ENSG group (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1607-8322 2220-5799 |
DOI: | 10.35975/apic.v0i0.1243 |