The Continuous Recombination of Codification and Personalisation KM strategies: A Retrospective Study
It is increasingly considered important to understand how companies plan their Knowledge Management (KM) strategy. The literature provides evidence that there may be different possible approaches to KM strategy. A significant distinction has been made between “codification” and “personalization”. So...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Electronic journal of knowledge management : EJKM 2020-04, Vol.18 (2) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | It is increasingly considered important to understand how
companies plan their Knowledge Management (KM) strategy. The
literature provides evidence that there may be different possible
approaches to KM strategy. A significant distinction has been made
between “codification” and “personalization”. Sometimes, these two
approaches have been seen to be alternative to one another. In other
cases scholars argued that a company can follow a strategy that
mixes the two approaches depending on diverse intertwined factors.
Still, on this topic, the literature provides various and sometimes
contrasting results that need clarification and confirmation.
Especially, there is the need to understand if changes in internal
and external conditions may induce modifications in a firm’s KM
strategy.The goal of the study is to analyse how the mix of
codification and personalisation can vary over time in the same
company, due to changing organizational and environmental
conditions. With this purpose, the evolution of KM initiatives of a
multinational company was investigated. The findings of the study
confirm that the strategic mix can change over the years due to
modifications in the factors of the company’s internal and external
context. Furthermore, the case shows that the different factors have
different weight and play a different role in influencing such
changes. Specifically, in the investigated case, the factors related
to the competitive context affected the evolution of the KM strategy
more significantly than internal factors (which were just enablers
or constraints of the evolutionary path). In addition, the study
shows that this classic distinction between codification and
personalization may not be easy to use in practical terms, due to
the complexity of KM activities and needs in a company: this point
can represent a fresh start of a future research agenda. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1479-4411 1479-4411 |
DOI: | 10.34190/EJKM.18.02.008 |