Correlations between left atrial strain and left atrial pressures values in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation

We aimed to investigate the correlations between left atrial strain (LAS) assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography and directly measured left atrial pressures (LAP) values and to estimate the features of patients with lower LAS values. A prospective, observational study was performed on patient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Kardiologia polska 2021-11, Vol.79 (11), p.1223-1230
Hauptverfasser: Uziębło-Życzkowska, Beata, Krzesiński, Paweł, Jurek, Agnieszka, Krzyżanowski, Krystian, Kiliszek, Marek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We aimed to investigate the correlations between left atrial strain (LAS) assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography and directly measured left atrial pressures (LAP) values and to estimate the features of patients with lower LAS values. A prospective, observational study was performed on patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing ablation. Detailed transthoracic echocardiography with the speckle tracking method was used to estimate the LAS reservoir (LASr) and direct measurements of LAP during ablation in all patients. A total of 172 patients were included (98 with sinus rhythm [SR] and 74 with AF). The patients with lower LASr (first tercile) compared to those with higher (third tercile), were older, more often female, presented with a larger left atrium (LA) (per the LA area and volume index), and had more impaired left ventricular (LV) diastolic function parameters (e', E/e'). The correlation analysis of the echocardiographic parameters with the LAP revealed the most significant correlations in the SR group, where the E/e' ratio, LASr, and LAS contraction (LASct) values were all associated with LAP. The cut-off value of LASr estimating high elevated mean LAP (≥15 mm Hg) was 21.88 (Area Under Curve [AUC], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.90; P
ISSN:0022-9032
1897-4279
DOI:10.33963/KP.a2021.0113