Satellite Remote Sensing for the Analysis of the Micia and Germisara Archaeological Sites
The capabilities of satellite remote sensing technologies and their derived data for the analysis of archaeological sites have been demonstrated in a large variety of studies over the last decades. Likewise, the Earth Observation (EO) data contribute to the disaster management process through the pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2020-06, Vol.12 (12), p.2003 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2003 |
container_title | Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Dana Negula, Iulia Moise, Cristian Lazăr, Andi Mihai Rișcuța, Nicolae Cătălin Cristescu, Cătălin Dedulescu, Andreea Luminița Mihalache, Cristina Elena Badea, Alexandru |
description | The capabilities of satellite remote sensing technologies and their derived data for the analysis of archaeological sites have been demonstrated in a large variety of studies over the last decades. Likewise, the Earth Observation (EO) data contribute to the disaster management process through the provision of updated information for areas under investigation. In addition, long term studies may be performed for the in–depth analysis of the disaster–prone areas using archive satellite imagery and other cartographic materials. Hence, satellite remote sensing represents an essential tool for the study of hazards in cultural heritage sites and landscapes. Depending on the size of the archaeological sites and considering the fact that some parts of the site might be covered, the main concern regards the suitability of satellite data in terms of spatial and spectral resolution. Using a multi–temporal Sentinel–2 dataset between 2016 and 2019, the present study focuses on the hazard risk identification for the Micia and Germisara archaeological sites in Romania as they are endangered by industrialisation and major infrastructure works and soil erosion, respectively. Furthermore, the study includes a performance assessment of remote sensing vegetation indices for the detection of buried structures. The results clearly indicate that Sentinel–2 imagery proved to be fundamental in meeting the objectives of the study, particularly due to the extensive archaeological knowledge that was available for the cultural heritage sites. The main conclusion to be drawn is that satellite–derived products may be enhanced by integrating valuable archaeological context, especially when the resolution of satellite data is not ideally fitting the peculiarities (e.g., in terms of size, underground structures, type of coverage) of the investigated cultural heritage sites. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/rs12122003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3390_rs12122003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_94dca15c2219480ead506c258008fd30</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2417739532</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-cab729ced9b916b0cc36c765543a4d46114bc8a95f92ebf549c2c731afdc6a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU9LAzEQxRdRsNRe_AQBb0I1f3c3x1K0FiqC7cVTmJ1N2pTtpibbQ7-9ayvqXN7M4_EbhsmyW0YfhND0MSbGGeeUiotswGnBx5Jrfvmvv85GKW1pX0IwTeUg-1hCZ5vGd5a8213oZWnb5Ns1cSGSbmPJpIXmmHwiwZ3mV48eCLQ1mdm48wkikEnEDdjQhLVHaMiyx6Wb7MpBk-zoR4fZ6vlpNX0ZL95m8-lkMUaRs26MUBVco611pVleUextLHKlpABZy5wxWWEJWjnNbeWU1MixEAxcjTkIMczmZ2wdYGv20e8gHk0Ab05GiGsDsfPYWKNljcAUcs60LKmFWtEcuSopLV0taM-6O7P2MXwebOrMNhxif38yXLKiEFoJ3qfuzymMIaVo3e9WRs33I8zfI8QXGpt5mg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2417739532</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Satellite Remote Sensing for the Analysis of the Micia and Germisara Archaeological Sites</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Dana Negula, Iulia ; Moise, Cristian ; Lazăr, Andi Mihai ; Rișcuța, Nicolae Cătălin ; Cristescu, Cătălin ; Dedulescu, Andreea Luminița ; Mihalache, Cristina Elena ; Badea, Alexandru</creator><creatorcontrib>Dana Negula, Iulia ; Moise, Cristian ; Lazăr, Andi Mihai ; Rișcuța, Nicolae Cătălin ; Cristescu, Cătălin ; Dedulescu, Andreea Luminița ; Mihalache, Cristina Elena ; Badea, Alexandru</creatorcontrib><description>The capabilities of satellite remote sensing technologies and their derived data for the analysis of archaeological sites have been demonstrated in a large variety of studies over the last decades. Likewise, the Earth Observation (EO) data contribute to the disaster management process through the provision of updated information for areas under investigation. In addition, long term studies may be performed for the in–depth analysis of the disaster–prone areas using archive satellite imagery and other cartographic materials. Hence, satellite remote sensing represents an essential tool for the study of hazards in cultural heritage sites and landscapes. Depending on the size of the archaeological sites and considering the fact that some parts of the site might be covered, the main concern regards the suitability of satellite data in terms of spatial and spectral resolution. Using a multi–temporal Sentinel–2 dataset between 2016 and 2019, the present study focuses on the hazard risk identification for the Micia and Germisara archaeological sites in Romania as they are endangered by industrialisation and major infrastructure works and soil erosion, respectively. Furthermore, the study includes a performance assessment of remote sensing vegetation indices for the detection of buried structures. The results clearly indicate that Sentinel–2 imagery proved to be fundamental in meeting the objectives of the study, particularly due to the extensive archaeological knowledge that was available for the cultural heritage sites. The main conclusion to be drawn is that satellite–derived products may be enhanced by integrating valuable archaeological context, especially when the resolution of satellite data is not ideally fitting the peculiarities (e.g., in terms of size, underground structures, type of coverage) of the investigated cultural heritage sites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/rs12122003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Archaeological sites ; Archives & records ; Buried structures ; Cartography ; Climate change ; Copernicus Programme ; Cultural heritage ; Cultural resources ; Detection ; Disaster management ; Disasters ; Earth ; Earth Observation ; Earthquakes ; Emergency preparedness ; Emergency services ; Historic buildings & sites ; Historic sites ; Identification ; Image detection ; Interferometry ; Landslides & mudslides ; Looting ; Performance assessment ; Remote sensing ; Risk assessment ; Satellite imagery ; Satellite technology ; Satellites ; Sensors ; Sentinel–2 ; Soil erosion ; Spectral resolution ; Underground structures ; Urbanization ; User needs ; vegetation indices</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2020-06, Vol.12 (12), p.2003</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-cab729ced9b916b0cc36c765543a4d46114bc8a95f92ebf549c2c731afdc6a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-cab729ced9b916b0cc36c765543a4d46114bc8a95f92ebf549c2c731afdc6a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,861,2096,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dana Negula, Iulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moise, Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazăr, Andi Mihai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rișcuța, Nicolae Cătălin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristescu, Cătălin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dedulescu, Andreea Luminița</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihalache, Cristina Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badea, Alexandru</creatorcontrib><title>Satellite Remote Sensing for the Analysis of the Micia and Germisara Archaeological Sites</title><title>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</title><description>The capabilities of satellite remote sensing technologies and their derived data for the analysis of archaeological sites have been demonstrated in a large variety of studies over the last decades. Likewise, the Earth Observation (EO) data contribute to the disaster management process through the provision of updated information for areas under investigation. In addition, long term studies may be performed for the in–depth analysis of the disaster–prone areas using archive satellite imagery and other cartographic materials. Hence, satellite remote sensing represents an essential tool for the study of hazards in cultural heritage sites and landscapes. Depending on the size of the archaeological sites and considering the fact that some parts of the site might be covered, the main concern regards the suitability of satellite data in terms of spatial and spectral resolution. Using a multi–temporal Sentinel–2 dataset between 2016 and 2019, the present study focuses on the hazard risk identification for the Micia and Germisara archaeological sites in Romania as they are endangered by industrialisation and major infrastructure works and soil erosion, respectively. Furthermore, the study includes a performance assessment of remote sensing vegetation indices for the detection of buried structures. The results clearly indicate that Sentinel–2 imagery proved to be fundamental in meeting the objectives of the study, particularly due to the extensive archaeological knowledge that was available for the cultural heritage sites. The main conclusion to be drawn is that satellite–derived products may be enhanced by integrating valuable archaeological context, especially when the resolution of satellite data is not ideally fitting the peculiarities (e.g., in terms of size, underground structures, type of coverage) of the investigated cultural heritage sites.</description><subject>Archaeological sites</subject><subject>Archives & records</subject><subject>Buried structures</subject><subject>Cartography</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Copernicus Programme</subject><subject>Cultural heritage</subject><subject>Cultural resources</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Disaster management</subject><subject>Disasters</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Earth Observation</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Emergency preparedness</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Historic buildings & sites</subject><subject>Historic sites</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Image detection</subject><subject>Interferometry</subject><subject>Landslides & mudslides</subject><subject>Looting</subject><subject>Performance assessment</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Satellite imagery</subject><subject>Satellite technology</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Sentinel–2</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Spectral resolution</subject><subject>Underground structures</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>User needs</subject><subject>vegetation indices</subject><issn>2072-4292</issn><issn>2072-4292</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU9LAzEQxRdRsNRe_AQBb0I1f3c3x1K0FiqC7cVTmJ1N2pTtpibbQ7-9ayvqXN7M4_EbhsmyW0YfhND0MSbGGeeUiotswGnBx5Jrfvmvv85GKW1pX0IwTeUg-1hCZ5vGd5a8213oZWnb5Ns1cSGSbmPJpIXmmHwiwZ3mV48eCLQ1mdm48wkikEnEDdjQhLVHaMiyx6Wb7MpBk-zoR4fZ6vlpNX0ZL95m8-lkMUaRs26MUBVco611pVleUextLHKlpABZy5wxWWEJWjnNbeWU1MixEAxcjTkIMczmZ2wdYGv20e8gHk0Ab05GiGsDsfPYWKNljcAUcs60LKmFWtEcuSopLV0taM-6O7P2MXwebOrMNhxif38yXLKiEFoJ3qfuzymMIaVo3e9WRs33I8zfI8QXGpt5mg</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Dana Negula, Iulia</creator><creator>Moise, Cristian</creator><creator>Lazăr, Andi Mihai</creator><creator>Rișcuța, Nicolae Cătălin</creator><creator>Cristescu, Cătălin</creator><creator>Dedulescu, Andreea Luminița</creator><creator>Mihalache, Cristina Elena</creator><creator>Badea, Alexandru</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Satellite Remote Sensing for the Analysis of the Micia and Germisara Archaeological Sites</title><author>Dana Negula, Iulia ; Moise, Cristian ; Lazăr, Andi Mihai ; Rișcuța, Nicolae Cătălin ; Cristescu, Cătălin ; Dedulescu, Andreea Luminița ; Mihalache, Cristina Elena ; Badea, Alexandru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-cab729ced9b916b0cc36c765543a4d46114bc8a95f92ebf549c2c731afdc6a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Archaeological sites</topic><topic>Archives & records</topic><topic>Buried structures</topic><topic>Cartography</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Copernicus Programme</topic><topic>Cultural heritage</topic><topic>Cultural resources</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Disaster management</topic><topic>Disasters</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Earth Observation</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Emergency preparedness</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Historic buildings & sites</topic><topic>Historic sites</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Image detection</topic><topic>Interferometry</topic><topic>Landslides & mudslides</topic><topic>Looting</topic><topic>Performance assessment</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Satellite imagery</topic><topic>Satellite technology</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Sentinel–2</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Spectral resolution</topic><topic>Underground structures</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>User needs</topic><topic>vegetation indices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dana Negula, Iulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moise, Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazăr, Andi Mihai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rișcuța, Nicolae Cătălin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristescu, Cătălin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dedulescu, Andreea Luminița</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihalache, Cristina Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badea, Alexandru</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dana Negula, Iulia</au><au>Moise, Cristian</au><au>Lazăr, Andi Mihai</au><au>Rișcuța, Nicolae Cătălin</au><au>Cristescu, Cătălin</au><au>Dedulescu, Andreea Luminița</au><au>Mihalache, Cristina Elena</au><au>Badea, Alexandru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Satellite Remote Sensing for the Analysis of the Micia and Germisara Archaeological Sites</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2003</spage><pages>2003-</pages><issn>2072-4292</issn><eissn>2072-4292</eissn><abstract>The capabilities of satellite remote sensing technologies and their derived data for the analysis of archaeological sites have been demonstrated in a large variety of studies over the last decades. Likewise, the Earth Observation (EO) data contribute to the disaster management process through the provision of updated information for areas under investigation. In addition, long term studies may be performed for the in–depth analysis of the disaster–prone areas using archive satellite imagery and other cartographic materials. Hence, satellite remote sensing represents an essential tool for the study of hazards in cultural heritage sites and landscapes. Depending on the size of the archaeological sites and considering the fact that some parts of the site might be covered, the main concern regards the suitability of satellite data in terms of spatial and spectral resolution. Using a multi–temporal Sentinel–2 dataset between 2016 and 2019, the present study focuses on the hazard risk identification for the Micia and Germisara archaeological sites in Romania as they are endangered by industrialisation and major infrastructure works and soil erosion, respectively. Furthermore, the study includes a performance assessment of remote sensing vegetation indices for the detection of buried structures. The results clearly indicate that Sentinel–2 imagery proved to be fundamental in meeting the objectives of the study, particularly due to the extensive archaeological knowledge that was available for the cultural heritage sites. The main conclusion to be drawn is that satellite–derived products may be enhanced by integrating valuable archaeological context, especially when the resolution of satellite data is not ideally fitting the peculiarities (e.g., in terms of size, underground structures, type of coverage) of the investigated cultural heritage sites.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/rs12122003</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2072-4292 |
ispartof | Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2020-06, Vol.12 (12), p.2003 |
issn | 2072-4292 2072-4292 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_3390_rs12122003 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Archaeological sites Archives & records Buried structures Cartography Climate change Copernicus Programme Cultural heritage Cultural resources Detection Disaster management Disasters Earth Earth Observation Earthquakes Emergency preparedness Emergency services Historic buildings & sites Historic sites Identification Image detection Interferometry Landslides & mudslides Looting Performance assessment Remote sensing Risk assessment Satellite imagery Satellite technology Satellites Sensors Sentinel–2 Soil erosion Spectral resolution Underground structures Urbanization User needs vegetation indices |
title | Satellite Remote Sensing for the Analysis of the Micia and Germisara Archaeological Sites |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T14%3A18%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Satellite%20Remote%20Sensing%20for%20the%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Micia%20and%20Germisara%20Archaeological%20Sites&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Dana%20Negula,%20Iulia&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2003&rft.pages=2003-&rft.issn=2072-4292&rft.eissn=2072-4292&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/rs12122003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2417739532%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2417739532&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_94dca15c2219480ead506c258008fd30&rfr_iscdi=true |