Satellite Remote Sensing for the Analysis of the Micia and Germisara Archaeological Sites

The capabilities of satellite remote sensing technologies and their derived data for the analysis of archaeological sites have been demonstrated in a large variety of studies over the last decades. Likewise, the Earth Observation (EO) data contribute to the disaster management process through the pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2020-06, Vol.12 (12), p.2003
Hauptverfasser: Dana Negula, Iulia, Moise, Cristian, Lazăr, Andi Mihai, Rișcuța, Nicolae Cătălin, Cristescu, Cătălin, Dedulescu, Andreea Luminița, Mihalache, Cristina Elena, Badea, Alexandru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2003
container_title Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)
container_volume 12
creator Dana Negula, Iulia
Moise, Cristian
Lazăr, Andi Mihai
Rișcuța, Nicolae Cătălin
Cristescu, Cătălin
Dedulescu, Andreea Luminița
Mihalache, Cristina Elena
Badea, Alexandru
description The capabilities of satellite remote sensing technologies and their derived data for the analysis of archaeological sites have been demonstrated in a large variety of studies over the last decades. Likewise, the Earth Observation (EO) data contribute to the disaster management process through the provision of updated information for areas under investigation. In addition, long term studies may be performed for the in–depth analysis of the disaster–prone areas using archive satellite imagery and other cartographic materials. Hence, satellite remote sensing represents an essential tool for the study of hazards in cultural heritage sites and landscapes. Depending on the size of the archaeological sites and considering the fact that some parts of the site might be covered, the main concern regards the suitability of satellite data in terms of spatial and spectral resolution. Using a multi–temporal Sentinel–2 dataset between 2016 and 2019, the present study focuses on the hazard risk identification for the Micia and Germisara archaeological sites in Romania as they are endangered by industrialisation and major infrastructure works and soil erosion, respectively. Furthermore, the study includes a performance assessment of remote sensing vegetation indices for the detection of buried structures. The results clearly indicate that Sentinel–2 imagery proved to be fundamental in meeting the objectives of the study, particularly due to the extensive archaeological knowledge that was available for the cultural heritage sites. The main conclusion to be drawn is that satellite–derived products may be enhanced by integrating valuable archaeological context, especially when the resolution of satellite data is not ideally fitting the peculiarities (e.g., in terms of size, underground structures, type of coverage) of the investigated cultural heritage sites.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/rs12122003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3390_rs12122003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_94dca15c2219480ead506c258008fd30</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2417739532</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-cab729ced9b916b0cc36c765543a4d46114bc8a95f92ebf549c2c731afdc6a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU9LAzEQxRdRsNRe_AQBb0I1f3c3x1K0FiqC7cVTmJ1N2pTtpibbQ7-9ayvqXN7M4_EbhsmyW0YfhND0MSbGGeeUiotswGnBx5Jrfvmvv85GKW1pX0IwTeUg-1hCZ5vGd5a8213oZWnb5Ns1cSGSbmPJpIXmmHwiwZ3mV48eCLQ1mdm48wkikEnEDdjQhLVHaMiyx6Wb7MpBk-zoR4fZ6vlpNX0ZL95m8-lkMUaRs26MUBVco611pVleUextLHKlpABZy5wxWWEJWjnNbeWU1MixEAxcjTkIMczmZ2wdYGv20e8gHk0Ab05GiGsDsfPYWKNljcAUcs60LKmFWtEcuSopLV0taM-6O7P2MXwebOrMNhxif38yXLKiEFoJ3qfuzymMIaVo3e9WRs33I8zfI8QXGpt5mg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2417739532</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Satellite Remote Sensing for the Analysis of the Micia and Germisara Archaeological Sites</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Dana Negula, Iulia ; Moise, Cristian ; Lazăr, Andi Mihai ; Rișcuța, Nicolae Cătălin ; Cristescu, Cătălin ; Dedulescu, Andreea Luminița ; Mihalache, Cristina Elena ; Badea, Alexandru</creator><creatorcontrib>Dana Negula, Iulia ; Moise, Cristian ; Lazăr, Andi Mihai ; Rișcuța, Nicolae Cătălin ; Cristescu, Cătălin ; Dedulescu, Andreea Luminița ; Mihalache, Cristina Elena ; Badea, Alexandru</creatorcontrib><description>The capabilities of satellite remote sensing technologies and their derived data for the analysis of archaeological sites have been demonstrated in a large variety of studies over the last decades. Likewise, the Earth Observation (EO) data contribute to the disaster management process through the provision of updated information for areas under investigation. In addition, long term studies may be performed for the in–depth analysis of the disaster–prone areas using archive satellite imagery and other cartographic materials. Hence, satellite remote sensing represents an essential tool for the study of hazards in cultural heritage sites and landscapes. Depending on the size of the archaeological sites and considering the fact that some parts of the site might be covered, the main concern regards the suitability of satellite data in terms of spatial and spectral resolution. Using a multi–temporal Sentinel–2 dataset between 2016 and 2019, the present study focuses on the hazard risk identification for the Micia and Germisara archaeological sites in Romania as they are endangered by industrialisation and major infrastructure works and soil erosion, respectively. Furthermore, the study includes a performance assessment of remote sensing vegetation indices for the detection of buried structures. The results clearly indicate that Sentinel–2 imagery proved to be fundamental in meeting the objectives of the study, particularly due to the extensive archaeological knowledge that was available for the cultural heritage sites. The main conclusion to be drawn is that satellite–derived products may be enhanced by integrating valuable archaeological context, especially when the resolution of satellite data is not ideally fitting the peculiarities (e.g., in terms of size, underground structures, type of coverage) of the investigated cultural heritage sites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/rs12122003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Archaeological sites ; Archives &amp; records ; Buried structures ; Cartography ; Climate change ; Copernicus Programme ; Cultural heritage ; Cultural resources ; Detection ; Disaster management ; Disasters ; Earth ; Earth Observation ; Earthquakes ; Emergency preparedness ; Emergency services ; Historic buildings &amp; sites ; Historic sites ; Identification ; Image detection ; Interferometry ; Landslides &amp; mudslides ; Looting ; Performance assessment ; Remote sensing ; Risk assessment ; Satellite imagery ; Satellite technology ; Satellites ; Sensors ; Sentinel–2 ; Soil erosion ; Spectral resolution ; Underground structures ; Urbanization ; User needs ; vegetation indices</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2020-06, Vol.12 (12), p.2003</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-cab729ced9b916b0cc36c765543a4d46114bc8a95f92ebf549c2c731afdc6a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-cab729ced9b916b0cc36c765543a4d46114bc8a95f92ebf549c2c731afdc6a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,861,2096,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dana Negula, Iulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moise, Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazăr, Andi Mihai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rișcuța, Nicolae Cătălin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristescu, Cătălin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dedulescu, Andreea Luminița</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihalache, Cristina Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badea, Alexandru</creatorcontrib><title>Satellite Remote Sensing for the Analysis of the Micia and Germisara Archaeological Sites</title><title>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</title><description>The capabilities of satellite remote sensing technologies and their derived data for the analysis of archaeological sites have been demonstrated in a large variety of studies over the last decades. Likewise, the Earth Observation (EO) data contribute to the disaster management process through the provision of updated information for areas under investigation. In addition, long term studies may be performed for the in–depth analysis of the disaster–prone areas using archive satellite imagery and other cartographic materials. Hence, satellite remote sensing represents an essential tool for the study of hazards in cultural heritage sites and landscapes. Depending on the size of the archaeological sites and considering the fact that some parts of the site might be covered, the main concern regards the suitability of satellite data in terms of spatial and spectral resolution. Using a multi–temporal Sentinel–2 dataset between 2016 and 2019, the present study focuses on the hazard risk identification for the Micia and Germisara archaeological sites in Romania as they are endangered by industrialisation and major infrastructure works and soil erosion, respectively. Furthermore, the study includes a performance assessment of remote sensing vegetation indices for the detection of buried structures. The results clearly indicate that Sentinel–2 imagery proved to be fundamental in meeting the objectives of the study, particularly due to the extensive archaeological knowledge that was available for the cultural heritage sites. The main conclusion to be drawn is that satellite–derived products may be enhanced by integrating valuable archaeological context, especially when the resolution of satellite data is not ideally fitting the peculiarities (e.g., in terms of size, underground structures, type of coverage) of the investigated cultural heritage sites.</description><subject>Archaeological sites</subject><subject>Archives &amp; records</subject><subject>Buried structures</subject><subject>Cartography</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Copernicus Programme</subject><subject>Cultural heritage</subject><subject>Cultural resources</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Disaster management</subject><subject>Disasters</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Earth Observation</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Emergency preparedness</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Historic buildings &amp; sites</subject><subject>Historic sites</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Image detection</subject><subject>Interferometry</subject><subject>Landslides &amp; mudslides</subject><subject>Looting</subject><subject>Performance assessment</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Satellite imagery</subject><subject>Satellite technology</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Sentinel–2</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Spectral resolution</subject><subject>Underground structures</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>User needs</subject><subject>vegetation indices</subject><issn>2072-4292</issn><issn>2072-4292</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU9LAzEQxRdRsNRe_AQBb0I1f3c3x1K0FiqC7cVTmJ1N2pTtpibbQ7-9ayvqXN7M4_EbhsmyW0YfhND0MSbGGeeUiotswGnBx5Jrfvmvv85GKW1pX0IwTeUg-1hCZ5vGd5a8213oZWnb5Ns1cSGSbmPJpIXmmHwiwZ3mV48eCLQ1mdm48wkikEnEDdjQhLVHaMiyx6Wb7MpBk-zoR4fZ6vlpNX0ZL95m8-lkMUaRs26MUBVco611pVleUextLHKlpABZy5wxWWEJWjnNbeWU1MixEAxcjTkIMczmZ2wdYGv20e8gHk0Ab05GiGsDsfPYWKNljcAUcs60LKmFWtEcuSopLV0taM-6O7P2MXwebOrMNhxif38yXLKiEFoJ3qfuzymMIaVo3e9WRs33I8zfI8QXGpt5mg</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Dana Negula, Iulia</creator><creator>Moise, Cristian</creator><creator>Lazăr, Andi Mihai</creator><creator>Rișcuța, Nicolae Cătălin</creator><creator>Cristescu, Cătălin</creator><creator>Dedulescu, Andreea Luminița</creator><creator>Mihalache, Cristina Elena</creator><creator>Badea, Alexandru</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Satellite Remote Sensing for the Analysis of the Micia and Germisara Archaeological Sites</title><author>Dana Negula, Iulia ; Moise, Cristian ; Lazăr, Andi Mihai ; Rișcuța, Nicolae Cătălin ; Cristescu, Cătălin ; Dedulescu, Andreea Luminița ; Mihalache, Cristina Elena ; Badea, Alexandru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-cab729ced9b916b0cc36c765543a4d46114bc8a95f92ebf549c2c731afdc6a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Archaeological sites</topic><topic>Archives &amp; records</topic><topic>Buried structures</topic><topic>Cartography</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Copernicus Programme</topic><topic>Cultural heritage</topic><topic>Cultural resources</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Disaster management</topic><topic>Disasters</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Earth Observation</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Emergency preparedness</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Historic buildings &amp; sites</topic><topic>Historic sites</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Image detection</topic><topic>Interferometry</topic><topic>Landslides &amp; mudslides</topic><topic>Looting</topic><topic>Performance assessment</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Satellite imagery</topic><topic>Satellite technology</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Sentinel–2</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Spectral resolution</topic><topic>Underground structures</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>User needs</topic><topic>vegetation indices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dana Negula, Iulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moise, Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazăr, Andi Mihai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rișcuța, Nicolae Cătălin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristescu, Cătălin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dedulescu, Andreea Luminița</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihalache, Cristina Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badea, Alexandru</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dana Negula, Iulia</au><au>Moise, Cristian</au><au>Lazăr, Andi Mihai</au><au>Rișcuța, Nicolae Cătălin</au><au>Cristescu, Cătălin</au><au>Dedulescu, Andreea Luminița</au><au>Mihalache, Cristina Elena</au><au>Badea, Alexandru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Satellite Remote Sensing for the Analysis of the Micia and Germisara Archaeological Sites</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2003</spage><pages>2003-</pages><issn>2072-4292</issn><eissn>2072-4292</eissn><abstract>The capabilities of satellite remote sensing technologies and their derived data for the analysis of archaeological sites have been demonstrated in a large variety of studies over the last decades. Likewise, the Earth Observation (EO) data contribute to the disaster management process through the provision of updated information for areas under investigation. In addition, long term studies may be performed for the in–depth analysis of the disaster–prone areas using archive satellite imagery and other cartographic materials. Hence, satellite remote sensing represents an essential tool for the study of hazards in cultural heritage sites and landscapes. Depending on the size of the archaeological sites and considering the fact that some parts of the site might be covered, the main concern regards the suitability of satellite data in terms of spatial and spectral resolution. Using a multi–temporal Sentinel–2 dataset between 2016 and 2019, the present study focuses on the hazard risk identification for the Micia and Germisara archaeological sites in Romania as they are endangered by industrialisation and major infrastructure works and soil erosion, respectively. Furthermore, the study includes a performance assessment of remote sensing vegetation indices for the detection of buried structures. The results clearly indicate that Sentinel–2 imagery proved to be fundamental in meeting the objectives of the study, particularly due to the extensive archaeological knowledge that was available for the cultural heritage sites. The main conclusion to be drawn is that satellite–derived products may be enhanced by integrating valuable archaeological context, especially when the resolution of satellite data is not ideally fitting the peculiarities (e.g., in terms of size, underground structures, type of coverage) of the investigated cultural heritage sites.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/rs12122003</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-4292
ispartof Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2020-06, Vol.12 (12), p.2003
issn 2072-4292
2072-4292
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3390_rs12122003
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Archaeological sites
Archives & records
Buried structures
Cartography
Climate change
Copernicus Programme
Cultural heritage
Cultural resources
Detection
Disaster management
Disasters
Earth
Earth Observation
Earthquakes
Emergency preparedness
Emergency services
Historic buildings & sites
Historic sites
Identification
Image detection
Interferometry
Landslides & mudslides
Looting
Performance assessment
Remote sensing
Risk assessment
Satellite imagery
Satellite technology
Satellites
Sensors
Sentinel–2
Soil erosion
Spectral resolution
Underground structures
Urbanization
User needs
vegetation indices
title Satellite Remote Sensing for the Analysis of the Micia and Germisara Archaeological Sites
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T14%3A18%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Satellite%20Remote%20Sensing%20for%20the%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Micia%20and%20Germisara%20Archaeological%20Sites&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Dana%20Negula,%20Iulia&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2003&rft.pages=2003-&rft.issn=2072-4292&rft.eissn=2072-4292&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/rs12122003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2417739532%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2417739532&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_94dca15c2219480ead506c258008fd30&rfr_iscdi=true