Application of MCDM-AHP and EDAS Methods for Selection of the Best Residential Locations Areas

The population density has led to an expansion of the area where people live. This opportunity is exploited by housing developers to build many locations  for the development of residential areas. The purpose of writing this paper is to provide proper consideration in housing selection which can be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:sinkron 2024-10, Vol.8 (4), p.2269-2280
Hauptverfasser: Akmaludin, Akmaludin, Sihombing, Erene Gernaria, Rinawati, Rinawati, Arisawati, Ester, Handayanna, Prisma
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The population density has led to an expansion of the area where people live. This opportunity is exploited by housing developers to build many locations  for the development of residential areas. The purpose of writing this paper is to provide proper consideration in housing selection which can be seen from various parameters as selection criteria. The method support that can be used in residential selection is the collaboration of the MCDM-AHP and EDAS methods. This method can be used as a recommendation against the concept of multi-criteria. The more criteria used, the higher the level of difficulty to support decision making. With the collaboration of the MDCM-AHP method, it can be used to provide an assessment of multi-criteria that have optimal values, while the EDAS method will be used as a strength in evaluating the selection of alternatives based on positive and negative distances for different types of criteria through normalized values. Determination of the weighting value of the criteria is obtained through the iteration stages using the mathematical algebra matrices method and proven by expert choice apps. The decision support results obtained provide a ranking value with the first priority being PR06 with an accumulative weight of 0.552 followed by the second and third ranks respectively PR04 and PR05 with a weight of 0.545 and 0.522 respectively. Thus supporting decision making with the recommendation of the MCDM-AHP and EDAS method collaboration can provide an optimal assessment of residential selection in a detailed and accurate manner.
ISSN:2541-044X
2541-2019
DOI:10.33395/sinkron.v8i4.13661