Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Safety of Interventions for Von Hippel-Lindau Associated Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review

Background: A small proportion of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are associated with hereditary syndromes such as von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL) and are commonly treated with surgical interventions. More recently, systemic treatments for VHL-associated RCC have been assessed as an alternative to surger...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Kidney cancer 2024-01, Vol.8 (1), p.1-15
Hauptverfasser: Jonasch, Eric, Balijepalli, Chakrapani, Yan, Kevin, Gullapalli, Lakshmi, Li, Joyce, Sundaram, Murali
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: A small proportion of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are associated with hereditary syndromes such as von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL) and are commonly treated with surgical interventions. More recently, systemic treatments for VHL-associated RCC have been assessed as an alternative to surgery. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Registry of Controlled Trials to collect and interpret published evidence on treatments for VHL-associated RCC patients to better understand the treatment landscape. Results: This review identified 32 primary studies, comprised of single-arm clinical trials and real-world studies assessing systemic, surgical, radiological, or image guided ablation interventions. In clinical trials, treatment with sunitinib and pazopanib showed an objective response in 33% and 52% of RCC lesions respectively. For patients treated with belzutifan, 64% of patients showed an objective response, of which 7% were complete response and 57% were partial responses with a 24-month PFS rate of 96%. In real-world studies, treatment with sunitinib, pazopanib, axitinib, and sorafenib showed an objective response in 40%, 0%, 33%, and 25% of RCC lesions respectively, and all the responses were partial. In the studies assessing surgical, radiological, or image guided ablation interventions primary failure/re-intervention rates ranged from 2% to 84%. Conclusion: Local procedures are still a mainstay in the management of patients with non-metastatic VHL-associated RCC although multiple procedures incur an increasing rate of complications. A limited number of clinical trials and real-world studies evaluated VEGF-TKIs for the treatment of VHL-RCC, while responses were observed, long term treatment was limited by toxicities.
ISSN:2468-4562
2468-4570
DOI:10.3233/KCA-230021