Queering Lucrezia’s Virtú
This article argues for a feminist reinterpretation of the ‘radical Machiavelli’ tradition which pushes Machiavelli’s performative theory of power towards emancipation. I base my argument on a rereading of Niccolò Machiavelli’s Mandragola, whose historical use of the mandrake legend, I claim, sympto...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Theoria (Pietermaritzburg) 2019-03, Vol.66 (158), p.51-75 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This article argues for a feminist reinterpretation of the ‘radical
Machiavelli’ tradition which pushes Machiavelli’s performative
theory of power towards emancipation. I base my argument on a rereading
of Niccolò Machiavelli’s Mandragola, whose historical use of the
mandrake legend, I claim, symptomatizes historically gendered forms of
labour expropriation characteristic of early modern capitalism. Against
the background of that historical contextualisation, I then argue against
James Martel’s interpretation of Machiavelli’s theory of open secrets,
as one that remains unable to extend to Lucrezia the democratic insights
that he identifies in Callimaco and Ligurio’s textual conspiracies. Dialectically
relocating the political heroism of this play in Lucrezia’s
performance, I conclude, Machiavelli’s comedy becomes nevertheless
useful for a subaltern theory of democratic action. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0040-5817 1558-5816 |
DOI: | 10.3167/th.2019.6615803 |