Do Payroll Tax Breaks Stimulate Formality? Evidence from Colombia’s Reform
Alternative work arrangements have grown rapidly around the world. In Latin America, these alternative work arrangements have long been part of the labor market and have continued to grow. The informal sector grew rapidly in Latin America over the past few decades comprising up to half of the workin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Economía (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2017-10, Vol.18 (1), p.3-40 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Alternative work arrangements have grown rapidly around the world. In Latin
America, these alternative work arrangements have long been part of the labor market and
have continued to grow. The informal sector grew rapidly in Latin America over the past
few decades comprising up to half of the working population in many countries. Some
attribute the growth in alternative work arrangements and informality to regulations and
taxes, while others argue that it is precisely the lack of enforcement of regulations
that allows unprotected employment arrangements to flourish. We examine whether reducing
taxes associated with employment stimulates formal sector employment. We exploit the
fact that the tax reform introduced in Colombia in 2012 affected only certain types of
workers and not others. In particular, workers earning less than ten times the minimum
wage and self-employed workers with more than two employees experienced a reduction of
payroll taxes of 13.5 percent between 2013 and 2014. We use the Colombian household
surveys, social security records and the monthly manufacturing sample to conduct
difference-in-differences analyses of the reform. We find evidence of increased formal
employment for the affected groups after the reform using all three data sets. We find
that the probability of formal employment and the likelihood of transitioning into
registered employment increased for the affected groups after the reform. We also find
that the level and share of permanent employment relative to temporary employment grew
after the reform for those earnings less than ten times the minimum wage. The results
are greatest for those in smaller firms and for those earnings close to the minimum
wage. JEL Codes: H2, J2, J24, and J31 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1533-6239 1533-6239 |
DOI: | 10.31389/eco.50 |