Dose escalation of epirubicin in the CEOP-BLEO Regimen: A Controlled clinical trial comparing standard doses for the treatment of diffuse large cell lymphoma
One hundred and forty-seven consecutive patients with previously untreated high-intermedium and high clinical risk diffuse large cell lymphoma (DLCL) were included in a prospective clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of escalating doses of epirubicin compared to standard doses in th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Leukemia & lymphoma 1997, Vol.25 (3-4), p.319-325 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | One hundred and forty-seven consecutive patients with previously untreated high-intermedium and high clinical risk diffuse large cell lymphoma (DLCL) were included in a prospective clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of escalating doses of epirubicin compared to standard doses in the CEOP-Bleo (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vincristine and prednisone and bleomycin) regimen. 55% of the patients were > 60 years old and most patients had adverse prognostic factors at diagnosis. Complete response rates were similar in both groups (68% in the standard dose compared to 73% in the escalating arm, (p = 0.5). However, time to treatment failure (TFF) and overall survival were better after escalating doses. At 3-years TTF at a median follow-up of 33.6 months was 76% in the patients whose received escalating dose statistical different to 37% of the patients whose received standard doses (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1042-8194 1029-2403 |
DOI: | 10.3109/10428199709114171 |