Feminism and Intercultural Information Ethics

Rafael Capurro calls for an intercultural information ethics that radically challenges its Eurocentric, Greek philosophical roots and grapples with and validates cultural diversity. One of the voices that must be included in this project is that of feminism, both within and outside of Western cultur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International review of information ethics 2004-11, Vol.2
1. Verfasser: Froehlich, Thomas J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title International review of information ethics
container_volume 2
creator Froehlich, Thomas J
description Rafael Capurro calls for an intercultural information ethics that radically challenges its Eurocentric, Greek philosophical roots and grapples with and validates cultural diversity. One of the voices that must be included in this project is that of feminism, both within and outside of Western culture. While there are a variety of feminist issues and approaches to feminism, embracing the naturalistic approach, suggested by Alison Jaggar, one can find sufficient commonalities, both in terms of a critique of traditional male-dominated Western ethics and in terms of a positive content and agenda, to establish a feminist framework. One strong voice that help create this framework is that of Carol Gilligan who studied the moral development of women. This paper argues that the “different voice” thesis of Gilligan (i.e., that men and women prototypically – not stereotypically – bring different voices to moral argumentation and ethical deliberation) can serve as an ethical principle, that permits all persons – male or female – to interrogate and guide their ethical choices, and that an ‘ethic of care’ can challenge an ‘ethic of rights,’ and on occasion can trump it as a major guiding ethical principle.
doi_str_mv 10.29173/irie253
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_29173_irie253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_29173_irie253</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_29173_irie2533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYBAwNNAzsjQ0N9bPLMpMNTI1ZmLgNDI1M9YFYgsWJDYHA29xcZYBEBgbG5pbWnIy6Lql5mbmZRbnKiTmpSh45pWkFiWX5pSUFiXmAHlp-UW5iSWZ-XkKriUZmcnFPAysaYk5xam8UJqbQcPNNcTZQze5KL-4uCg1Lb6gKDM3sagy3tAgHuyieKiLjElQCgCAoTwF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feminism and Intercultural Information Ethics</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Froehlich, Thomas J</creator><creatorcontrib>Froehlich, Thomas J</creatorcontrib><description>Rafael Capurro calls for an intercultural information ethics that radically challenges its Eurocentric, Greek philosophical roots and grapples with and validates cultural diversity. One of the voices that must be included in this project is that of feminism, both within and outside of Western culture. While there are a variety of feminist issues and approaches to feminism, embracing the naturalistic approach, suggested by Alison Jaggar, one can find sufficient commonalities, both in terms of a critique of traditional male-dominated Western ethics and in terms of a positive content and agenda, to establish a feminist framework. One strong voice that help create this framework is that of Carol Gilligan who studied the moral development of women. This paper argues that the “different voice” thesis of Gilligan (i.e., that men and women prototypically – not stereotypically – bring different voices to moral argumentation and ethical deliberation) can serve as an ethical principle, that permits all persons – male or female – to interrogate and guide their ethical choices, and that an ‘ethic of care’ can challenge an ‘ethic of rights,’ and on occasion can trump it as a major guiding ethical principle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2563-5638</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2563-5638</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.29173/irie253</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>International review of information ethics, 2004-11, Vol.2</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Froehlich, Thomas J</creatorcontrib><title>Feminism and Intercultural Information Ethics</title><title>International review of information ethics</title><description>Rafael Capurro calls for an intercultural information ethics that radically challenges its Eurocentric, Greek philosophical roots and grapples with and validates cultural diversity. One of the voices that must be included in this project is that of feminism, both within and outside of Western culture. While there are a variety of feminist issues and approaches to feminism, embracing the naturalistic approach, suggested by Alison Jaggar, one can find sufficient commonalities, both in terms of a critique of traditional male-dominated Western ethics and in terms of a positive content and agenda, to establish a feminist framework. One strong voice that help create this framework is that of Carol Gilligan who studied the moral development of women. This paper argues that the “different voice” thesis of Gilligan (i.e., that men and women prototypically – not stereotypically – bring different voices to moral argumentation and ethical deliberation) can serve as an ethical principle, that permits all persons – male or female – to interrogate and guide their ethical choices, and that an ‘ethic of care’ can challenge an ‘ethic of rights,’ and on occasion can trump it as a major guiding ethical principle.</description><issn>2563-5638</issn><issn>2563-5638</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYBAwNNAzsjQ0N9bPLMpMNTI1ZmLgNDI1M9YFYgsWJDYHA29xcZYBEBgbG5pbWnIy6Lql5mbmZRbnKiTmpSh45pWkFiWX5pSUFiXmAHlp-UW5iSWZ-XkKriUZmcnFPAysaYk5xam8UJqbQcPNNcTZQze5KL-4uCg1Lb6gKDM3sagy3tAgHuyieKiLjElQCgCAoTwF</recordid><startdate>20041101</startdate><enddate>20041101</enddate><creator>Froehlich, Thomas J</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041101</creationdate><title>Feminism and Intercultural Information Ethics</title><author>Froehlich, Thomas J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_29173_irie2533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Froehlich, Thomas J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International review of information ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Froehlich, Thomas J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feminism and Intercultural Information Ethics</atitle><jtitle>International review of information ethics</jtitle><date>2004-11-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>2</volume><issn>2563-5638</issn><eissn>2563-5638</eissn><abstract>Rafael Capurro calls for an intercultural information ethics that radically challenges its Eurocentric, Greek philosophical roots and grapples with and validates cultural diversity. One of the voices that must be included in this project is that of feminism, both within and outside of Western culture. While there are a variety of feminist issues and approaches to feminism, embracing the naturalistic approach, suggested by Alison Jaggar, one can find sufficient commonalities, both in terms of a critique of traditional male-dominated Western ethics and in terms of a positive content and agenda, to establish a feminist framework. One strong voice that help create this framework is that of Carol Gilligan who studied the moral development of women. This paper argues that the “different voice” thesis of Gilligan (i.e., that men and women prototypically – not stereotypically – bring different voices to moral argumentation and ethical deliberation) can serve as an ethical principle, that permits all persons – male or female – to interrogate and guide their ethical choices, and that an ‘ethic of care’ can challenge an ‘ethic of rights,’ and on occasion can trump it as a major guiding ethical principle.</abstract><doi>10.29173/irie253</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2563-5638
ispartof International review of information ethics, 2004-11, Vol.2
issn 2563-5638
2563-5638
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_29173_irie253
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
title Feminism and Intercultural Information Ethics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A34%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feminism%20and%20Intercultural%20Information%20Ethics&rft.jtitle=International%20review%20of%20information%20ethics&rft.au=Froehlich,%20Thomas%20J&rft.date=2004-11-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issn=2563-5638&rft.eissn=2563-5638&rft_id=info:doi/10.29173/irie253&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_29173_irie253%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true