Feminism and Intercultural Information Ethics
Rafael Capurro calls for an intercultural information ethics that radically challenges its Eurocentric, Greek philosophical roots and grapples with and validates cultural diversity. One of the voices that must be included in this project is that of feminism, both within and outside of Western cultur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International review of information ethics 2004-11, Vol.2 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Rafael Capurro calls for an intercultural information ethics that radically challenges its Eurocentric, Greek
philosophical roots and grapples with and validates cultural diversity. One of the voices that must be included
in this project is that of feminism, both within and outside of Western culture. While there are a variety of
feminist issues and approaches to feminism, embracing the naturalistic approach, suggested by Alison
Jaggar, one can find sufficient commonalities, both in terms of a critique of traditional male-dominated
Western ethics and in terms of a positive content and agenda, to establish a feminist framework. One strong
voice that help create this framework is that of Carol Gilligan who studied the moral development of women.
This paper argues that the “different voice” thesis of Gilligan (i.e., that men and women prototypically – not
stereotypically – bring different voices to moral argumentation and ethical deliberation) can serve as an
ethical principle, that permits all persons – male or female – to interrogate and guide their ethical choices,
and that an ‘ethic of care’ can challenge an ‘ethic of rights,’ and on occasion can trump it as a major guiding
ethical principle. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2563-5638 2563-5638 |
DOI: | 10.29173/irie253 |