Akibat Hukum Penggunaan Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan Dengan Kreditur Pemegang Hak Tanggungan
This research aims to analyze the legal consequences of using a Power of Attorney to Encumber Mortgage Rights (SKMHT), focusing on creditor protection when mortgage rights are not registered at the Land Office. Legal uncertainty arises for creditors when SKMHT, intended as a temporary measure, is no...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Jurnal USM law review 2024-12, Vol.7 (3), p.1705 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This research aims to analyze the legal consequences of using a Power of Attorney to Encumber Mortgage Rights (SKMHT), focusing on creditor protection when mortgage rights are not registered at the Land Office. Legal uncertainty arises for creditors when SKMHT, intended as a temporary measure, is not followed by the Deed of Granting of Mortgage Rights (APHT) and registration. This non-registration potentially harms creditors by depriving them of preferential rights in collateral execution. The urgency of this study is driven by the frequent use of SKMHT in banking and financial practices, which often lack proper legal follow-up, creating loopholes that disadvantage creditors. Using a normative juridical method. The novelty lies in exploring the legal risks faced by creditors due to non-registration, a topic that has received limited attention in prior studies. This research fills a gap by examining practical risks and proposing legal solutions to emphasize the importance of legal certainty in collateral execution. The findings show that creditors who fail to register mortgage rights after SKMHT issuance lose legal protection, making it crucial for creditors to act promptly and follow up with APHT within legal time limits. Doing so ensures execution power and prevents significant losses if debtors default. Legal reforms are essential to enhance protection and certainty in Indonesia’s debt security framework. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis akibat hukum penggunaan SKMHT, khususnya terkait perlindungan kreditur ketika hak tanggungan tidak didaftarkan di Kantor Pertanahan. Ketidakpastian hukum yang dialami kreditur saat SKMHT, yang seharusnya bersifat sementara, tidak diikuti oleh pembuatan APHT dan pendaftaran di Kantor Pertanahan. Ketidakdaftaran ini berpotensi merugikan kreditur karena mereka kehilangan hak preferen dalam eksekusi jaminan. Urgensi penelitian ini didasarkan pada meningkatnya penggunaan SKMHT dalam praktik perbankan dan lembaga pembiayaan, yang sering kali tidak diikuti oleh langkah hukum yang semestinya, sehingga menimbulkan celah hukum yang merugikan kreditur. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif. Kebaruan dari penelitian ini terletak pada analisis mendalam mengenai akibat hukum bagi kreditur ketika pendaftaran hak tanggungan tidak dilakukan, yang belum banyak dibahas dalam penelitian sebelumnya, penelitian ini mengeksplorasi konsekuensi praktis dan risiko yang dihadapi kreditur, serta memberikan solusi hukum yang menyor |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2621-4105 2621-4105 |
DOI: | 10.26623/julr.v7i3.9708 |