Od-Kantować Rawlsa: ewolucyjne uzasadnienie teorii sprawiedliwości w ujęciu Kena Binmore’a
De-Kanting Rawls: evolutionary justifcation of the theory of justice by Ken Binmore: The article discusses the criticism of John Rawls’s theory of justice formulated by Ken Binmore. Binmore criticizes Rawls in his work for inadequate justifcation of fairness norms. In his opinion, their proper justi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Argument (Kraków. 2011) 2019-06, Vol.9 (1), p.57-80 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | De-Kanting Rawls: evolutionary justifcation of the theory of justice by Ken Binmore:
The article discusses the criticism of John Rawls’s theory of justice formulated by Ken Binmore. Binmore criticizes Rawls in his work for inadequate justifcation of fairness norms. In
his opinion, their proper justifcation requires the rejection of Kant’s “metaphysics” in favor
of Hume’s empiricism. To explain how fairness norms actually work, one must frst provide
a convincing account of evolutionary processes that could lead to such norms being encoded
in our genome. Secondly, it should be explained how this biological mechanism interacts with
our cultural heritage and generates a selection of balance points in games that describe our
social interactions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2083-6635 2084-1043 |
DOI: | 10.24917/20841043.9.1.4 |