E-Government clusters in the EU based on the Gaussian Mixture Models
The use of advanced ICT technologies and the support of new ways of thinking, acting and working in public administration, together with the increased provision of information and interactive services accessible through various channels, is the foundation of eGovernment. In recent years, there has b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC 2020, Vol.1 (35), p.6-20 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The use of advanced ICT technologies and the support of new ways of thinking,
acting and working in public administration, together with the increased provision of
information and interactive services accessible through various channels, is the foundation
of eGovernment. In recent years, there has been visible progress in all EU countries in
terms of the general framework for e-government strategy, which is based on best practices
and methodologies. The aim of our research is to discover the way in which the EU states
are situated from the point of view of the digitalization of the administration. For this I
used Gaussian models. The main research parameters were: accessibility; transparency,
investments in information and communication technologies and investments in
infrastructure related to public administrations in EU countries. The results show
significant differences between state administrations. We applied Gaussian Mixture Model
clustering in order to make an analysis of the national E-government situation in the
European Union for 2018. The GMM algorithm estimated six clusters. We find that the first
cluster, with Nordic countries, Netherlands and Austria, has the highest values of
telecommunication infrastructure, citizens’ access to e-government services and
Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index. At the opposite pole, in cluster
2, Romania and Bulgaria have the lowest values of these three indicators, while their
public investment levels are not significantly under EU averages. Our research provides
not only an overview of the digitization of administrations, but also what are the main lags
that state administrations have to recover in order to reach a digital system integrated into
the EU's administrative space. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1583-9583 2559-6489 |
DOI: | 10.24818/amp/2020.35-01 |