Die Differenz im Einssein Notizen zur arendtschen „Banalität des Bösen
This paper takes up the controversial arendtian term “banality of evil” and shows how plurality rooted in non-indifference is necessary for preventing us from acting bad. Distinct from “radical Evil” the “Banality of Evil” is not in itself banal. Evil deeds sneak into everyday life if being-one with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Review of Ecumenical Studies 2024-08, Vol.16 (2), p.336-350 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This paper takes up the controversial arendtian term “banality of evil” and shows how plurality rooted in non-indifference is necessary for preventing us from acting bad. Distinct from “radical Evil” the “Banality of Evil” is not in itself banal. Evil deeds sneak into everyday life if being-one with oneself by consulting with oneself on the actions to be taken is missing. Hence, being-one presupposes plurality for the inner dialogue. As a matter of fact, plurality is rooted in the natality of human beings, in being born as being separated and differentiated from others. Nevertheless, conscious plurality as active non-indifference in thought and judgment is yet necessary. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2359-8107 2359-8107 |
DOI: | 10.2478/ress-2024-0022 |