Prevalence and correlates of preventive care among adults with diabetes in Kansas
Prevalence and correlates of preventive care among adults with diabetes in Kansas. H K Ahluwalia , C E Miller , S P Pickard , M S Mayo , J S Ahluwalia and G L Beckles Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. hahluwalia@kumc.edu Abstract OBJECT...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diabetes care 2000-04, Vol.23 (4), p.484-489 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Prevalence and correlates of preventive care among adults with diabetes in Kansas.
H K Ahluwalia ,
C E Miller ,
S P Pickard ,
M S Mayo ,
J S Ahluwalia and
G L Beckles
Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. hahluwalia@kumc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and correlates of recommended preventive care among adults with diabetes in Kansas. RESEARCH
DESIGN AND METHODS: A cross-sectional telephone survey was conducted among a sample of adults (> or = 18 years of age) with
self-reported diabetes. Recommended preventive care was defined based on four criteria: number of health-care provider (HCP)
visits per year (> or = 4 for insulin users and > or = 2 for nonusers), number of foot examinations per year (> or = 4 for
insulin users and > or = 2 for nonusers), an annual dilated eye examination, and a blood pressure measurement in the past
6 months. RESULTS: The mean age of the 640 respondents was 61 years, 58% were women, and 86% were white. In the preceding
year, 62% of respondents reported the appropriate number of visits to a HCP 27% the appropriate number of foot examinations,
65% an annual dilated eye examination, and 89% a blood pressure measurement in the preceding 6 months. Only 17% (95% CI 14-20)
met all four criteria for recommended care. The adjusted odds of receiving recommended care were higher for males than for
females (odds ratio [OR] 1.6; 95% CI 1.1-2.5), higher for people whose HCP scheduled follow-up appointments than for those
who self-initiated follow-up (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.6-4.8), and higher for former smokers than for current smokers (OR 3.1; 95%
CI 1.6-6.9). CONCLUSIONS: Preventive care for people with diabetes is not being delivered in compliance with current guidelines,
especially for women and current smokers. Scheduling follow-up visits for patients, targeting certain high-risk populations,
and developing protocols to improve foot care may be effective in improving care. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0149-5992 1935-5548 |
DOI: | 10.2337/diacare.23.4.484 |