Do No Harm: Whistleblowing on Medicare Fraud
The high incidence of healthcare fraud in the United States resulted in the creation of multiple outlets to report fraud, such as the Medicare Hotline, the Office of the Inspector General, and the filing of False Claim Act lawsuits associated with whistleblower rewards. Despite the high incidence, e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of forensic accounting research 2023-12, Vol.8 (1), p.431-460 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 460 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 431 |
container_title | Journal of forensic accounting research |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Lamboy-Ruiz, Melvin A. McKay, Britton A. Scheetz, Andrea M. |
description | The high incidence of healthcare fraud in the United States resulted in the creation of multiple outlets to report fraud, such as the Medicare Hotline, the Office of the Inspector General, and the filing of False Claim Act lawsuits associated with whistleblower rewards. Despite the high incidence, examinations of whistleblowing factors in this industry, such as whistleblowers’ professional roles and fraud types, are scarce, and the interaction effects of these factors are unknown. In this study, participants from two different professional roles disclose their likelihood of reporting Medicare fraud through the aforementioned three reporting outlets conditional on two different billing fraud types. The results indicate that although workers in both professional roles show similar likelihoods to report fraud regardless of the reporting outlet, fraud type and its interaction with the professional role influence some but not all the reporting likelihoods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2308/JFAR-2021-015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2308_JFAR_2021_015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_2308_JFAR_2021_015</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c775-5c76939cc71bb2771ef983854b23028943739b069cbf07ff471bd7ad601a499d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNz0FLAzEQBeAgCpbao_f8AKOTzO4m8Vaqa5WqIAWPIckmurJtJFHEf-8uevA07zA83kfIKYdzgaAu7trlExMgOANeH5CZQAVMcFSH__IxWZTyBgBcKqwVzsjZVaIPia5t3l3S59e-fAzBDemr37_QtKf3oeu9zYG22X52J-Qo2qGExd-dk217vV2t2ebx5na13DAvZc1qLxuN2nvJnRNS8hC1QlVXbhwqlK5QonbQaO8iyBir8a-TtmuA20rrDueE_db6nErJIZr33O9s_jYczIQ1E9ZMWDNi8QfF-kRb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do No Harm: Whistleblowing on Medicare Fraud</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Lamboy-Ruiz, Melvin A. ; McKay, Britton A. ; Scheetz, Andrea M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lamboy-Ruiz, Melvin A. ; McKay, Britton A. ; Scheetz, Andrea M.</creatorcontrib><description>The high incidence of healthcare fraud in the United States resulted in the creation of multiple outlets to report fraud, such as the Medicare Hotline, the Office of the Inspector General, and the filing of False Claim Act lawsuits associated with whistleblower rewards. Despite the high incidence, examinations of whistleblowing factors in this industry, such as whistleblowers’ professional roles and fraud types, are scarce, and the interaction effects of these factors are unknown. In this study, participants from two different professional roles disclose their likelihood of reporting Medicare fraud through the aforementioned three reporting outlets conditional on two different billing fraud types. The results indicate that although workers in both professional roles show similar likelihoods to report fraud regardless of the reporting outlet, fraud type and its interaction with the professional role influence some but not all the reporting likelihoods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2380-2138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2380-2138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2308/JFAR-2021-015</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of forensic accounting research, 2023-12, Vol.8 (1), p.431-460</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c775-5c76939cc71bb2771ef983854b23028943739b069cbf07ff471bd7ad601a499d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9016-4313 ; 0000-0002-7807-5104</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lamboy-Ruiz, Melvin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKay, Britton A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheetz, Andrea M.</creatorcontrib><title>Do No Harm: Whistleblowing on Medicare Fraud</title><title>Journal of forensic accounting research</title><description>The high incidence of healthcare fraud in the United States resulted in the creation of multiple outlets to report fraud, such as the Medicare Hotline, the Office of the Inspector General, and the filing of False Claim Act lawsuits associated with whistleblower rewards. Despite the high incidence, examinations of whistleblowing factors in this industry, such as whistleblowers’ professional roles and fraud types, are scarce, and the interaction effects of these factors are unknown. In this study, participants from two different professional roles disclose their likelihood of reporting Medicare fraud through the aforementioned three reporting outlets conditional on two different billing fraud types. The results indicate that although workers in both professional roles show similar likelihoods to report fraud regardless of the reporting outlet, fraud type and its interaction with the professional role influence some but not all the reporting likelihoods.</description><issn>2380-2138</issn><issn>2380-2138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNz0FLAzEQBeAgCpbao_f8AKOTzO4m8Vaqa5WqIAWPIckmurJtJFHEf-8uevA07zA83kfIKYdzgaAu7trlExMgOANeH5CZQAVMcFSH__IxWZTyBgBcKqwVzsjZVaIPia5t3l3S59e-fAzBDemr37_QtKf3oeu9zYG22X52J-Qo2qGExd-dk217vV2t2ebx5na13DAvZc1qLxuN2nvJnRNS8hC1QlVXbhwqlK5QonbQaO8iyBir8a-TtmuA20rrDueE_db6nErJIZr33O9s_jYczIQ1E9ZMWDNi8QfF-kRb</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Lamboy-Ruiz, Melvin A.</creator><creator>McKay, Britton A.</creator><creator>Scheetz, Andrea M.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9016-4313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7807-5104</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Do No Harm: Whistleblowing on Medicare Fraud</title><author>Lamboy-Ruiz, Melvin A. ; McKay, Britton A. ; Scheetz, Andrea M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c775-5c76939cc71bb2771ef983854b23028943739b069cbf07ff471bd7ad601a499d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lamboy-Ruiz, Melvin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKay, Britton A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheetz, Andrea M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of forensic accounting research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lamboy-Ruiz, Melvin A.</au><au>McKay, Britton A.</au><au>Scheetz, Andrea M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do No Harm: Whistleblowing on Medicare Fraud</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forensic accounting research</jtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>431</spage><epage>460</epage><pages>431-460</pages><issn>2380-2138</issn><eissn>2380-2138</eissn><abstract>The high incidence of healthcare fraud in the United States resulted in the creation of multiple outlets to report fraud, such as the Medicare Hotline, the Office of the Inspector General, and the filing of False Claim Act lawsuits associated with whistleblower rewards. Despite the high incidence, examinations of whistleblowing factors in this industry, such as whistleblowers’ professional roles and fraud types, are scarce, and the interaction effects of these factors are unknown. In this study, participants from two different professional roles disclose their likelihood of reporting Medicare fraud through the aforementioned three reporting outlets conditional on two different billing fraud types. The results indicate that although workers in both professional roles show similar likelihoods to report fraud regardless of the reporting outlet, fraud type and its interaction with the professional role influence some but not all the reporting likelihoods.</abstract><doi>10.2308/JFAR-2021-015</doi><tpages>30</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9016-4313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7807-5104</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2380-2138 |
ispartof | Journal of forensic accounting research, 2023-12, Vol.8 (1), p.431-460 |
issn | 2380-2138 2380-2138 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_2308_JFAR_2021_015 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
title | Do No Harm: Whistleblowing on Medicare Fraud |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T20%3A01%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20No%20Harm:%20Whistleblowing%20on%20Medicare%20Fraud&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forensic%20accounting%20research&rft.au=Lamboy-Ruiz,%20Melvin%20A.&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=431&rft.epage=460&rft.pages=431-460&rft.issn=2380-2138&rft.eissn=2380-2138&rft_id=info:doi/10.2308/JFAR-2021-015&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_2308_JFAR_2021_015%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |