Do No Harm: Whistleblowing on Medicare Fraud

The high incidence of healthcare fraud in the United States resulted in the creation of multiple outlets to report fraud, such as the Medicare Hotline, the Office of the Inspector General, and the filing of False Claim Act lawsuits associated with whistleblower rewards. Despite the high incidence, e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of forensic accounting research 2023-12, Vol.8 (1), p.431-460
Hauptverfasser: Lamboy-Ruiz, Melvin A., McKay, Britton A., Scheetz, Andrea M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 460
container_issue 1
container_start_page 431
container_title Journal of forensic accounting research
container_volume 8
creator Lamboy-Ruiz, Melvin A.
McKay, Britton A.
Scheetz, Andrea M.
description The high incidence of healthcare fraud in the United States resulted in the creation of multiple outlets to report fraud, such as the Medicare Hotline, the Office of the Inspector General, and the filing of False Claim Act lawsuits associated with whistleblower rewards. Despite the high incidence, examinations of whistleblowing factors in this industry, such as whistleblowers’ professional roles and fraud types, are scarce, and the interaction effects of these factors are unknown. In this study, participants from two different professional roles disclose their likelihood of reporting Medicare fraud through the aforementioned three reporting outlets conditional on two different billing fraud types. The results indicate that although workers in both professional roles show similar likelihoods to report fraud regardless of the reporting outlet, fraud type and its interaction with the professional role influence some but not all the reporting likelihoods.
doi_str_mv 10.2308/JFAR-2021-015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2308_JFAR_2021_015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_2308_JFAR_2021_015</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c775-5c76939cc71bb2771ef983854b23028943739b069cbf07ff471bd7ad601a499d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNz0FLAzEQBeAgCpbao_f8AKOTzO4m8Vaqa5WqIAWPIckmurJtJFHEf-8uevA07zA83kfIKYdzgaAu7trlExMgOANeH5CZQAVMcFSH__IxWZTyBgBcKqwVzsjZVaIPia5t3l3S59e-fAzBDemr37_QtKf3oeu9zYG22X52J-Qo2qGExd-dk217vV2t2ebx5na13DAvZc1qLxuN2nvJnRNS8hC1QlVXbhwqlK5QonbQaO8iyBir8a-TtmuA20rrDueE_db6nErJIZr33O9s_jYczIQ1E9ZMWDNi8QfF-kRb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do No Harm: Whistleblowing on Medicare Fraud</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Lamboy-Ruiz, Melvin A. ; McKay, Britton A. ; Scheetz, Andrea M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lamboy-Ruiz, Melvin A. ; McKay, Britton A. ; Scheetz, Andrea M.</creatorcontrib><description>The high incidence of healthcare fraud in the United States resulted in the creation of multiple outlets to report fraud, such as the Medicare Hotline, the Office of the Inspector General, and the filing of False Claim Act lawsuits associated with whistleblower rewards. Despite the high incidence, examinations of whistleblowing factors in this industry, such as whistleblowers’ professional roles and fraud types, are scarce, and the interaction effects of these factors are unknown. In this study, participants from two different professional roles disclose their likelihood of reporting Medicare fraud through the aforementioned three reporting outlets conditional on two different billing fraud types. The results indicate that although workers in both professional roles show similar likelihoods to report fraud regardless of the reporting outlet, fraud type and its interaction with the professional role influence some but not all the reporting likelihoods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2380-2138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2380-2138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2308/JFAR-2021-015</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of forensic accounting research, 2023-12, Vol.8 (1), p.431-460</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c775-5c76939cc71bb2771ef983854b23028943739b069cbf07ff471bd7ad601a499d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9016-4313 ; 0000-0002-7807-5104</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lamboy-Ruiz, Melvin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKay, Britton A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheetz, Andrea M.</creatorcontrib><title>Do No Harm: Whistleblowing on Medicare Fraud</title><title>Journal of forensic accounting research</title><description>The high incidence of healthcare fraud in the United States resulted in the creation of multiple outlets to report fraud, such as the Medicare Hotline, the Office of the Inspector General, and the filing of False Claim Act lawsuits associated with whistleblower rewards. Despite the high incidence, examinations of whistleblowing factors in this industry, such as whistleblowers’ professional roles and fraud types, are scarce, and the interaction effects of these factors are unknown. In this study, participants from two different professional roles disclose their likelihood of reporting Medicare fraud through the aforementioned three reporting outlets conditional on two different billing fraud types. The results indicate that although workers in both professional roles show similar likelihoods to report fraud regardless of the reporting outlet, fraud type and its interaction with the professional role influence some but not all the reporting likelihoods.</description><issn>2380-2138</issn><issn>2380-2138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNz0FLAzEQBeAgCpbao_f8AKOTzO4m8Vaqa5WqIAWPIckmurJtJFHEf-8uevA07zA83kfIKYdzgaAu7trlExMgOANeH5CZQAVMcFSH__IxWZTyBgBcKqwVzsjZVaIPia5t3l3S59e-fAzBDemr37_QtKf3oeu9zYG22X52J-Qo2qGExd-dk217vV2t2ebx5na13DAvZc1qLxuN2nvJnRNS8hC1QlVXbhwqlK5QonbQaO8iyBir8a-TtmuA20rrDueE_db6nErJIZr33O9s_jYczIQ1E9ZMWDNi8QfF-kRb</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Lamboy-Ruiz, Melvin A.</creator><creator>McKay, Britton A.</creator><creator>Scheetz, Andrea M.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9016-4313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7807-5104</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Do No Harm: Whistleblowing on Medicare Fraud</title><author>Lamboy-Ruiz, Melvin A. ; McKay, Britton A. ; Scheetz, Andrea M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c775-5c76939cc71bb2771ef983854b23028943739b069cbf07ff471bd7ad601a499d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lamboy-Ruiz, Melvin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKay, Britton A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheetz, Andrea M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of forensic accounting research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lamboy-Ruiz, Melvin A.</au><au>McKay, Britton A.</au><au>Scheetz, Andrea M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do No Harm: Whistleblowing on Medicare Fraud</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forensic accounting research</jtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>431</spage><epage>460</epage><pages>431-460</pages><issn>2380-2138</issn><eissn>2380-2138</eissn><abstract>The high incidence of healthcare fraud in the United States resulted in the creation of multiple outlets to report fraud, such as the Medicare Hotline, the Office of the Inspector General, and the filing of False Claim Act lawsuits associated with whistleblower rewards. Despite the high incidence, examinations of whistleblowing factors in this industry, such as whistleblowers’ professional roles and fraud types, are scarce, and the interaction effects of these factors are unknown. In this study, participants from two different professional roles disclose their likelihood of reporting Medicare fraud through the aforementioned three reporting outlets conditional on two different billing fraud types. The results indicate that although workers in both professional roles show similar likelihoods to report fraud regardless of the reporting outlet, fraud type and its interaction with the professional role influence some but not all the reporting likelihoods.</abstract><doi>10.2308/JFAR-2021-015</doi><tpages>30</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9016-4313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7807-5104</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2380-2138
ispartof Journal of forensic accounting research, 2023-12, Vol.8 (1), p.431-460
issn 2380-2138
2380-2138
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2308_JFAR_2021_015
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
title Do No Harm: Whistleblowing on Medicare Fraud
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T20%3A01%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20No%20Harm:%20Whistleblowing%20on%20Medicare%20Fraud&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forensic%20accounting%20research&rft.au=Lamboy-Ruiz,%20Melvin%20A.&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=431&rft.epage=460&rft.pages=431-460&rft.issn=2380-2138&rft.eissn=2380-2138&rft_id=info:doi/10.2308/JFAR-2021-015&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_2308_JFAR_2021_015%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true