Do No Harm: Whistleblowing on Medicare Fraud

The high incidence of healthcare fraud in the United States resulted in the creation of multiple outlets to report fraud, such as the Medicare Hotline, the Office of the Inspector General, and the filing of False Claim Act lawsuits associated with whistleblower rewards. Despite the high incidence, e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of forensic accounting research 2023-12, Vol.8 (1), p.431-460
Hauptverfasser: Lamboy-Ruiz, Melvin A., McKay, Britton A., Scheetz, Andrea M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The high incidence of healthcare fraud in the United States resulted in the creation of multiple outlets to report fraud, such as the Medicare Hotline, the Office of the Inspector General, and the filing of False Claim Act lawsuits associated with whistleblower rewards. Despite the high incidence, examinations of whistleblowing factors in this industry, such as whistleblowers’ professional roles and fraud types, are scarce, and the interaction effects of these factors are unknown. In this study, participants from two different professional roles disclose their likelihood of reporting Medicare fraud through the aforementioned three reporting outlets conditional on two different billing fraud types. The results indicate that although workers in both professional roles show similar likelihoods to report fraud regardless of the reporting outlet, fraud type and its interaction with the professional role influence some but not all the reporting likelihoods.
ISSN:2380-2138
2380-2138
DOI:10.2308/JFAR-2021-015